Banks Jonathan B, Brancaleone Paul J, Holtzman Amanda S
College of Psychology, Nova Southeastern University.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Feb 13. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001450.
Factors that predict mind wandering in the laboratory and in daily life differ (Kane et al., 2007, 2017). However, it is unknown how these predictors may vary when considering two identified dimensions of mind wandering-intentionality and emotional valence. We examined this with a 1-week daily-life experience sampling study with laboratory-based measures of working memory, personality, anxiety, and dispositional mindfulness predicting mind wandering in daily life. Overall, our results suggest that predictors of mind wandering in daily life vary based on both the intentionality and emotional valence dimension of the off-task thought. Dispositional mindfulness was predictive of neutral, intentional, and overall rates of mind wandering. Interactions between working memory and concentration level were observed for some but not all dimensions of mind wandering. The current findings suggest that is it critical to consider both intentionality and emotional valence dimensions to understand individual differences in mind wandering in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在实验室和日常生活中,预测走神的因素有所不同(凯恩等人,2007年,2017年)。然而,当考虑走神的两个已确定维度——意向性和情感效价时,这些预测因素如何变化尚不清楚。我们通过一项为期1周的日常生活经验抽样研究对此进行了考察,该研究采用基于实验室的工作记忆、人格、焦虑和特质正念测量来预测日常生活中的走神。总体而言,我们的结果表明,日常生活中走神的预测因素会因任务无关思维的意向性和情感效价维度而有所不同。特质正念可预测中性、有意和总体的走神率。在走神的某些但并非所有维度上,观察到了工作记忆与注意力集中水平之间的相互作用。当前的研究结果表明,在理解日常生活中走神的个体差异时,考虑意向性和情感效价维度至关重要。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)