He Lin, Jiang Shaoqiang, Jiang Tingting, Chen Wanjun, Zheng Jinlei, Wang Hui, Chai Chengliang
Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China.
Coastal Service Center, Hangzhou, China.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 13;27:e66702. doi: 10.2196/66702.
China has recently implemented a strategy to promote and facilitate community organization involvement in HIV prevention among men who have sex with men (MSM). Although community-based strategies have been shown to increase HIV testing uptake, the relative effectiveness of mobile social media promotion compared with volunteer-driven recruitment remains underexplored. Limited research has investigated how these strategies differentially affect MSM who have not undergone previous HIV testing.
This study aimed to compare the differences between a mobile social media promotion strategy and a volunteer-driven strategy for community organizations to recruit MSM for HIV testing.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to December 2023 among MSM in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants aged 16 years with an HIV-negative or unknown status were recruited either through a mobile social media promotion strategy or through a volunteer-driven strategy by a community organization. They completed a questionnaire that collected information on demographics, sexual behavior, and HIV testing history. All participants were tested for HIV after completing the questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with recruitment through mobile social media promotion.
The study included 4600 MSM, of whom 3035 (66%) were recruited through the mobile social media strategy. Overall, 1.4% (66/4600) of participants tested positive for HIV, and 18.8% (865/4600) underwent HIV testing for the first time. Recruitment via the mobile social media promotion strategy was significantly associated with several factors: having only gay sexual partners (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.45), having more than 2 sexual partners in the past 3 months (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.42-2.11), frequently using rush poppers during sex (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.99), having a history of sexually transmitted infections (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02-2.39), having awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.71), having awareness of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP; aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.79), using mail-in HIV self-testing kits (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.77-2.31), testing HIV-positive (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.10-3.72), and first-time HIV testing (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.52).
Community organizations play a critical role in expanding HIV testing and identifying undiagnosed individuals infected with HIV. Compared to the volunteer-driven outreach, mobile social media promotion strategies had a higher proportion of first-time testers and a higher rate of HIV positivity. We recommend prioritizing mobile social media strategies in regions with limited LGBTQ+ organizations or HIV health services to increase HIV testing coverage and interventions among MSM.
中国最近实施了一项战略,以促进和便利社区组织参与男男性行为者(MSM)中的艾滋病毒预防工作。尽管基于社区的战略已被证明能提高艾滋病毒检测率,但与志愿者驱动的招募方式相比,移动社交媒体推广的相对有效性仍未得到充分探索。有限的研究调查了这些策略如何对之前未接受过艾滋病毒检测的男男性行为者产生不同影响。
本研究旨在比较社区组织招募男男性行为者进行艾滋病毒检测时,移动社交媒体推广策略与志愿者驱动策略之间的差异。
2023年7月至12月在中国浙江省的男男性行为者中进行了一项横断面研究。年龄在16岁及以上、艾滋病毒检测结果为阴性或未知的参与者,通过移动社交媒体推广策略或由社区组织采用志愿者驱动策略进行招募。他们完成了一份问卷,收集了人口统计学、性行为和艾滋病毒检测史等信息。所有参与者在完成问卷后均接受了艾滋病毒检测。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与通过移动社交媒体推广招募相关的因素。
该研究纳入了4600名男男性行为者,其中3035名(66%)通过移动社交媒体策略招募。总体而言,1.4%(66/4600)的参与者艾滋病毒检测呈阳性,18.8%(865/4600)首次接受艾滋病毒检测。通过移动社交媒体推广策略进行招募与以下几个因素显著相关:仅有男性性伴侣(调整后的比值比[aOR]为1.23,95%置信区间为1.05 - 1.45)、在过去3个月内有超过2个性伴侣(aOR为1.74,95%置信区间为1.42 - 2.11)、性行为中频繁使用催情剂(aOR为1.39,95%置信区间为1.14 - 1.99)、有性传播感染史(aOR为1.56,95%置信区间为1.02 - 2.39)、了解暴露前预防(aOR为1.42,95%置信区间为1.19 - 1.71)、了解暴露后预防(PEP;aOR为1.49,95%置信区间为1.24 - 1.79)、使用邮寄式艾滋病毒自我检测试剂盒(aOR为2.02,95%置信区间为1.77 - 2.31)、艾滋病毒检测呈阳性(aOR为2.02,95%置信区间为1.10 - 3.72)以及首次艾滋病毒检测(aOR为1.28,95%置信区间为1.09 - 1.52)。
社区组织在扩大艾滋病毒检测和识别未被诊断的艾滋病毒感染者方面发挥着关键作用。与志愿者驱动的外展活动相比,移动社交媒体推广策略中首次检测者的比例更高,艾滋病毒阳性率也更高。我们建议在 LGBTQ+ 组织或艾滋病毒健康服务有限的地区优先采用移动社交媒体策略,以提高男男性行为者中的艾滋病毒检测覆盖率和干预措施。