Qu Rirong, Zhang Yang, Qin Shenghui, Xiong Jing, Fu Xiangning, Li Lequn, Tu Dehao, Cai Yixin
Thoracic Surgery Laboratory, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Department of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Discov Oncol. 2025 Feb 13;16(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01898-5.
The prognosis of ground glass opacity featured lung adenocarcinomas (GGO-LUAD) is significantly better than that of solid nodule featured lung adenocarcinomas (SN-LUAD), but the specific reasons behind their indolent tumor behavior are still unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate their differences in intratumoral microvessels, related angiogenic factors and important stromal cells.
Thirty patients (15 paired patients only with GGO or SN) diagnosed with pathological stage 0-I lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical treatment were included into this study. Immunohistochemistry was performed to stain the blood vessel markers (CD31, CD34 and CD105), LYVE-1, the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) markers (α-SMA and S100A4), TGF-β and HIF-1α from 30 patients tissue sections. At the same time, Ki67 Labeling Index (LI) extracted from pathological report of all patients was also analyzed.
GGO-LUAD is more abundant than SN-LUAD in lymphatic vessel density (LVD), but similar in total microvessel density (CD31 + MVD). However, GGO-LUAD is significantly lower than SN-LUAD in CD34 + MVD and CD105 + MVD. In terms of TGF-β, HIF-1α expression and Ki67 LI level, GGO-LUAD was also significantly weaker than SN-LUAD. Moreover, the distribution of CAFs in GGO-LUAD is less than that in SN-LUAD. Regardless of the pathological type (adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) or invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC)), there is no difference in any of the above indicators in GGO-LUAD.
Our finding displays that GGO-LUAD was significantly lower than SN-LUAD in CD34 + MVD and CD105 + MVD reflecting tumor angiogenesis, and the distribution of CAFs and factors related to tumor angiogenesis were also significantly lower in GGO-LUAD, which may indicate that the weak ability of angiogenesis might be the reason for the good prognosis of GGO-LUAD.
磨玻璃密度型肺腺癌(GGO-LUAD)的预后明显优于实性结节型肺腺癌(SN-LUAD),但其肿瘤生长缓慢的具体原因仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨它们在肿瘤内微血管、相关血管生成因子和重要基质细胞方面的差异。
本研究纳入30例接受手术治疗的病理分期为0-I期肺腺癌患者(15对仅患有GGO或SN的配对患者)。对30例患者的组织切片进行免疫组织化学染色,以检测血管标志物(CD31、CD34和CD105)、LYVE-1、癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)标志物(α-SMA和S100A4)、转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)和缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)。同时,还分析了所有患者病理报告中的Ki67标记指数(LI)。
GGO-LUAD的淋巴管密度(LVD)比SN-LUAD更丰富,但总微血管密度(CD31+MVD)相似。然而,GGO-LUAD的CD34+MVD和CD105+MVD明显低于SN-LUAD。在TGF-β、HIF-1α表达和Ki67 LI水平方面,GGO-LUAD也明显低于SN-LUAD。此外,GGO-LUAD中CAFs的分布少于SN-LUAD。无论病理类型(原位腺癌(AIS)或微浸润腺癌(MIA)或浸润性肺腺癌(IAC))如何,GGO-LUAD在上述任何指标上均无差异。
我们的研究结果显示,反映肿瘤血管生成的GGO-LUAD的CD34+MVD和CD105+MVD明显低于SN-LUAD,并且GGO-LUAD中CAFs的分布以及与肿瘤血管生成相关的因子也明显更低,这可能表明血管生成能力较弱可能是GGO-LUAD预后良好的原因。