Arter Zhaohui Liao, Lee Alexandria T M, Nagasaka Misako, Ou Sai-Hong Ignatius
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, USA.
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, California, USA.
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(4):e70665. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70665.
Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of NTRK fusion (NTRK+) and RET fusion (RET+) positive solid tumors in a tumor-agnostic manner. However, the objective response rate was the lowest among entrectinib-treated NTRK+ colorectal cancer (CRC) (20%) and selpercatinib-treated RET+ CRC (20%) among all NTRK+, and RET+ solid tumors, respectively.
We compared tumor mutation burden (TMB) in NTRK+/RET+ CRC with all other NTRK+ and RET+ solid tumors using the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) GENIE database (Version 13.0).
We identified 14,812 unique CRC patients. Considering only samples with identified fusion partners, the mean TMB was 66.6 ± 15.8 (mt/MB) for NTRK+ CRC (N = 9) and 35 ± 11.5 for RET+ CRC (N = 4), which were significantly higher when compared to the mean number of 6.2 ± 5.4 of TMB for all other RTK+ CRC (N = 30, p < 0.05). Furthermore, NTRK+ CRC harbored significantly higher TMB than RET+ CRC (p = 0.003). In comparison, the mean TMB was 4.0 ± 1.9 for RET+ NSCLC (N = 65) and 2.6 ± 1.6 for RET+ Thyroid cancer (N = 52). Mean TMB for all other NTRK+ solid tumors was < 11 and significantly lower than the mean TMB of NTRK+ CRC. 1482 (10.0%) CRC patients had their MSI status reported. Three out of three NTRK+ CRC patients with known MSI status were all dMMR (100%). 0 out of 12 non-NTRK/non-RET RTK+ CRC patients were dMMR (0%).
NRTK+ and RET+ CRC possess significantly higher TMB than other RTK+ CRC or NTRK+/RET+ non-CRC solid tumors. TMB testing should be routinely done in MSI-H CRC, and TMB ≥ 35 mut/MB samples should be screened for NTRK and RET fusions as an enrichment strategy to provide additional treatment for NTRK+ and RET+ CRC patients.
受体酪氨酸激酶(RTK)抑制剂已被批准以肿瘤非特异性方式治疗NTRK融合(NTRK+)和RET融合(RET+)阳性实体瘤。然而,在所有NTRK+和RET+实体瘤中,恩曲替尼治疗的NTRK+结直肠癌(CRC)(20%)和塞尔帕替尼治疗的RET+ CRC(20%)的客观缓解率分别是最低的。
我们使用美国癌症研究协会(AACR)GENIE数据库(版本13.0)比较了NTRK+/RET+ CRC与所有其他NTRK+和RET+实体瘤的肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)。
我们识别出14812例独特的CRC患者。仅考虑具有已识别融合伴侣的样本,NTRK+ CRC(N = 9)的平均TMB为66.6±15.8(突变数/百万碱基),RET+ CRC(N = 4)为35±11.5,与所有其他RTK+ CRC(N = 30)的TMB平均数6.2±5.4相比显著更高(p < 0.05)。此外,NTRK+ CRC的TMB显著高于RET+ CRC(p = 0.003)。相比之下,RET+非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(N = 65)的平均TMB为4.0±1.9,RET+甲状腺癌(N = 52)为2.6±1.6。所有其他NTRK+实体瘤的平均TMB < 11,且显著低于NTRK+ CRC的平均TMB。1482例(10.0%)CRC患者报告了其微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态。已知MSI状态的3例NTRK+ CRC患者全部为错配修复缺陷(dMMR)(100%)。12例非NTRK/非RET RTK+ CRC患者中0例为dMMR(0%)。
NRTK+和RET+ CRC的TMB显著高于其他RTK+ CRC或NTRK+/RET+非CRC实体瘤。应在微卫星高度不稳定(MSI-H)的CRC中常规进行TMB检测,对于TMB≥35突变/百万碱基的样本应筛查NTRK和RET融合,作为一种富集策略,为NTRK+和RET+ CRC患者提供额外治疗。