Lupu-Gladstein Noah, Pang Ou Teen Arthur, Ferretti Hugo, Tham Weng-Kian, Steinberg Aephraim M, Bonsma-Fisher Kent, Brodutch Aharon
Department of Physics and Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada.
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2416331122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416331122. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
We implement a variant of the quantum pigeonhole paradox thought experiment to study whether classical counting principles survive in the quantum domain. We observe strong measurements significantly violate the pigeonhole principle (that among three pigeons in two holes, at least one pair must be in the same hole) and the sum rule (that the number of pigeon pairs in the same hole is the sum of the number of pairs across each of the holes) in an ensemble that is pre- and postselected into particular separable states. To investigate whether measurement disturbance is a viable explanation for these counterintuitive phenomena, we employ a we employ variable-strength nonlocal measurements. As we decrease the measurement strength, we find the violation of the sum rule decreases, yet the pigeonhole principle remains violated. In the weak limit, the sum rule is restored due to the cancellation between two weak values with equal and opposite imaginary parts. We observe the same kind of cancellation at higher measurement strengths, thus raising the question: do strong measurements have imaginary parts?
我们实施了量子鸽巢悖论思想实验的一个变体,以研究经典计数原则在量子领域是否依然成立。我们观察到,在预先选择和后选择到特定可分离态的系综中,强测量显著违反了鸽巢原理(即在两个洞中放置三只鸽子,至少有一对鸽子必定在同一个洞中)和求和规则(即同一洞中鸽子对的数量是每个洞中鸽子对数量之和)。为了研究测量干扰是否是这些反直觉现象的一个合理的解释,我们采用了可变强度的非局域测量。随着测量强度的降低,我们发现求和规则的违反程度减小,但鸽巢原理仍然被违反。在弱测量极限下,由于具有相等且相反虚部的两个弱值之间的抵消,求和规则得以恢复。我们在更高的测量强度下也观察到了同样类型的抵消,从而引发了一个问题:强测量是否具有虚部?