Suppr超能文献

因急性胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者中急性冠状动脉综合征过度诊断的发生率、预测因素及性别差异。

Incidence, predictors, and sex differences in acute coronary syndrome overdiagnosis among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain.

作者信息

Fiore Giorgio, Pinto Giuseppe, Oppizzi Michele, Slavich Massimo, Gaspardone Carlo, Furlan Federico, Valsecchi Davide, Margonato Alberto, Fragasso Gabriele

机构信息

Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2025 Jun;85(6):507-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the era of high-sensitivity troponin assays, overdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has become increasingly common, overriding underdiagnosis and carrying a burden of healthcare issues. This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and sex differences in ACS overdiagnosis among patients presenting with chest pain (CP) to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Consecutive CP patients presenting at the ED were included. Patients with other causes of CP, non-suspicious for ACS, were excluded. Six-month ACS rate was assessed in discharged patients. In ACS hospitalized patients, clinical records were analyzed to evaluate true-ACS incidence. Patients inappropriately hospitalized for ACS (ACS-overdiagnosis, false-positives) were compared to correctly discharged (true-negatives) and actual ACS patients (true-positives and false-negatives).

RESULTS

From 7040 CP patients, a random sample of 1025 was included. ACS was initially diagnosed in 237 (23.1 %) patients who were hospitalized, while 788 (76.9 %) were discharged from the ED. ACS misdiagnosis occurred in 30 (2.9 %) patients: 8 (1 %) discharged patients experienced ACS at follow-up (false-negatives) while 22 (9.3 %) hospitalized for ACS were considered not to have ACS (ACS-overdiagnosis). True incident ACS at 6 months was 223 (21.8 %). Independent predictors of ACS overdiagnosis were electrocardiographic alterations, troponin T > 99° percentile, and male sex, while women were older with lower pre-test likelihood of ACS according to ED physicians, with a higher rate of early discharge but similar outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

ACS overdiagnosis is more frequent than underdiagnosis, carrying potential issues for the healthcare system. Patients with ACS overdiagnosis were more commonly men with elevated high-sensitivity troponin, often indistinguishable from true-ACS patients according to standard care.

摘要

背景

在高敏肌钙蛋白检测时代,急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的过度诊断日益普遍,掩盖了漏诊情况,并带来一系列医疗问题。本研究旨在评估急诊科(ED)中胸痛(CP)患者ACS过度诊断的发生率、预测因素及性别差异。

方法

纳入连续就诊于ED的CP患者。排除因其他原因导致CP且不怀疑为ACS的患者。对出院患者评估6个月的ACS发生率。对住院的ACS患者,分析临床记录以评估真正的ACS发生率。将因ACS不适当住院的患者(ACS过度诊断,假阳性)与正确出院的患者(真阴性)以及实际的ACS患者(真阳性和假阴性)进行比较。

结果

从7040例CP患者中,随机抽取1025例纳入研究。最初诊断为ACS并住院的患者有237例(23.1%),而788例(76.9%)从ED出院。30例(2.9%)患者发生ACS误诊:8例(1%)出院患者在随访时发生ACS(假阴性),而22例(9.3%)因ACS住院的患者被认为没有ACS(ACS过度诊断)。6个月时真正发生ACS的患者为223例(21.8%)。ACS过度诊断的独立预测因素包括心电图改变、肌钙蛋白T>第99百分位数以及男性,而女性年龄较大,根据ED医生判断其ACS的预检可能性较低,早期出院率较高,但结局相似。

结论

ACS过度诊断比漏诊更常见,给医疗系统带来潜在问题。ACS过度诊断的患者更常见于高敏肌钙蛋白升高的男性,根据标准治疗,他们通常与真正的ACS患者难以区分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验