Zhao Boyue, Cheng Bolun, Li Xinyang, Xia Jinyu, Gou Yifan, Kang Meijuan, Hui Jingni, Liu Ye, Zhou Ruixue, Liu Chen, Wang Bingyi, Shi Panxing, Zhang Feng
Collaborative Innovation Center of Endemic Disease and Health Promotion for Silk Road Region, School of Public Health, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710061, PR China.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Endemic Disease and Health Promotion for Silk Road Region, School of Public Health, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710061, PR China; Key Laboratory of Trace Elements and Endemic Diseases (Xi'an Jiaotong University), National Health and Family Planning Commission, Xi'an, 710061, PR China; Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Ministry of Education, Xi'an, 710061, PR China.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;12(4):100078. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100078. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
Previous studies have revealed how single foods or nutrients affect dementia, but the evidence for a potential link between dietary diversity and dementia is inconsistent.
This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary diversity and the risk of incident dementia.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective study included 104,572 white participants without dementia at baseline recruited between 2006 and 2010 from the UK Biobank.
Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) was acquired through the Oxford WebQ's 24-hour dietary recall survey spanning from 2009 to 2012. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the associations between DDS, diversity scores of food groups and the risk of incident dementia. Stratified analyses were subsequently conducted to assess the potential variations across different demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic risk groups.
Over a median follow-up period of 10.44 years, 725 participants developed incident dementia. A higher DDS was associated with a lower risk of incident dementia (HR: 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.93-0.97). Stratified analyses revealed statistical significance in this association for individuals under 65 years old (HR: 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.92-0.98), and those with higher polygenic risk scores (PRS; HR: 0.92; 95 % CI: 0.89-0.95). Among five food groups, a higher diversity score for meat and protein alternatives was associated with a lower risk of dementia (HR: 0.92; 95 % CI: 0.86-0.99).
Enhancing dietary diversity reduces dementia risk, and is potentially influenced by genetic predisposition. Consuming a diverse range of foods may be an effective strategy against dementia.
以往研究揭示了单一食物或营养素如何影响痴呆症,但饮食多样性与痴呆症之间潜在联系的证据并不一致。
本研究旨在评估饮食多样性与新发痴呆症风险之间的关联。
设计、背景与参与者:这项前瞻性研究纳入了2006年至2010年从英国生物银行招募的104,572名基线时无痴呆症的白人参与者。
饮食多样性评分(DDS)通过牛津网络问卷2009年至2012年的24小时饮食回顾调查获得。采用Cox比例风险模型来估计DDS、食物组多样性评分与新发痴呆症风险之间的关联。随后进行分层分析,以评估不同人口统计学、社会经济和遗传风险组之间的潜在差异。
在中位随访期10.44年期间,725名参与者出现了新发痴呆症。较高的DDS与较低的新发痴呆症风险相关(风险比:0.95;95%置信区间:0.93 - 0.97)。分层分析显示,这种关联在65岁以下个体(风险比:0.95;95%置信区间:0.92 - 0.98)和多基因风险评分较高者(PRS;风险比:0.92;95%置信区间:0.89 - 0.95)中具有统计学意义。在五个食物组中,肉类和蛋白质替代品的多样性评分较高与较低的痴呆症风险相关(风险比:0.92;95%置信区间:0.86 - 0.99)。
提高饮食多样性可降低痴呆症风险,且可能受遗传易感性影响。食用种类多样的食物可能是预防痴呆症的有效策略。