Vriendt Manon D E, Rooryck Caroline, Madar Hugo, Coatleven Frédéric, Vincienne Marie, Prier Perrine, Naudion Sophie, Sentilhes Loïc, Bouchghoul Hanane
Department of Obstetrics, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Department of Genetics, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):629-636. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15055. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
Decisions concerning nuchal translucency (NT) between 3.0 and 3.4 mm remain controversial, particularly regarding whether to first calculate the combined first trimester screening test or to proceed directly with invasive testing. The literature suggests an increased risk of chromosomal aberration, as well as pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) on chromosomal microarray, for fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. The aim of this study was to describe genetic findings of fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm in the first trimester. The secondary objective was to describe ultrasound findings and adverse outcomes for these fetuses. The third objective was to compare genetic, ultrasound findings and adverse outcomes of fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm to those with NT ≥3.5 mm.
We conducted an observational, retrospective study in a referral center between 2017 and 2022. Genetic and ultrasound findings were compared between fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and those with NT≥3.5 mm. An adverse outcome was defined as one of the following: miscarriage, perinatal death (stillbirth or neonatal death) or termination of pregnancy at parental request, and all major abnormalities or genetic disorders diagnosed before or after delivery.
We included 404 fetuses with NT≥3.0 mm who had invasive testing with available karyotype and chromosomal microarray, among whom 20.8% (84/404) had NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. The rate of adverse outcomes among fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm was 32.1% (27/84). The rates of chromosomal aberration, pathogenic CNVs, and major ultrasound abnormalities were 16.7% (14/84), 6.0%(5/84), and 9.2% (6/65), respectively, for fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. In comparison, fetuses with NT greater than 3.5 mm had higher rates of chromosomal aberration and major ultrasound abnormalities, with rates of 47.5% (152/320) and 30.2% (49/162) respectively compared to 16.7% (14/84) and 9.2% (6/65) for fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). However, the rate of pathogenic CNVs was not significantly different between the two groups, with rates of 1.9% (6/320) for NT≥3.5 mm and 6.0% (5/84) for NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm (p = 0.06).
The rate of chromosomal aberration and pathogenic CNVs on chromosomal microarray is high among fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm, although these rates remain lower than those observed among fetuses with NT≥3.5 mm.
关于颈部半透明厚度(NT)在3.0至3.4毫米之间的处理决策仍存在争议,特别是在是先计算孕早期联合筛查试验还是直接进行侵入性检测方面。文献表明,NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间的胎儿,其染色体畸变以及染色体微阵列上致病性拷贝数变异(CNV)的风险增加。本研究的目的是描述孕早期NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间胎儿的基因检测结果。次要目标是描述这些胎儿的超声检查结果及不良结局。第三个目标是比较NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间胎儿与NT≥3.5毫米胎儿的基因检测结果、超声检查结果及不良结局。
我们于2017年至2022年在一家转诊中心进行了一项观察性回顾性研究。比较了NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间的胎儿与NT≥3.5毫米的胎儿的基因检测结果和超声检查结果。不良结局定义为以下情况之一:流产、围产期死亡(死产或新生儿死亡)或应父母要求终止妊娠,以及分娩前后诊断出的所有重大异常或遗传疾病。
我们纳入了404例NT≥3.0毫米且进行了侵入性检测并获得核型和染色体微阵列结果的胎儿,其中20.8%(84/404)的胎儿NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间。NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间的胎儿不良结局发生率为32.1%(27/84)。NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间的胎儿,其染色体畸变率、致病性CNV率和主要超声异常率分别为16.7%(14/84)、6.0%(5/84)和9.2%(6/65)。相比之下,NT大于3.5毫米的胎儿染色体畸变率和主要超声异常率更高,分别为47.5%(152/320)和30.2%(49/162),而NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间的胎儿分别为16.7%(14/84)和9.2%(6/65)(两项比较p均<0.001)。然而,两组之间致病性CNV率无显著差异,NT≥3.5毫米组为1.9%(6/320),NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间组为6.0%(5/84)(p = 0.06)。
NT在3.0至3.4毫米之间的胎儿,其染色体微阵列上的染色体畸变率和致病性CNV率较高,尽管这些比率仍低于NT≥3.5毫米的胎儿。