Johnson Jeffrey S, Niwa Mamiko, O'Connor Kevin N, Malone Brian J, Sutter Mitchell L
Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, United States.
Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, United States.
J Neurophysiol. 2025 Mar 1;133(3):944-964. doi: 10.1152/jn.00519.2024. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
We recorded from neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) and middle-lateral belt area (ML) while rhesus macaques either discriminated amplitude-modulated noise (AM) from unmodulated noise or passively heard the same stimuli. We used several post hoc pooling models to investigate the ability of auditory cortex to leverage population coding for AM detection. We find that pooled-response AM detection is better in the active condition than the passive condition, and better using rate-based coding than synchrony-based coding. Neurons can be segregated into two classes based on whether they increase (INC) or decrease (DEC) their firing rate in response to increasing modulation depth. In these samples, A1 had relatively fewer DEC neurons (26%) than ML (45%). When responses were pooled without segregating these classes, AM detection using rate-based coding was much better in A1 than in ML, but when pooling only INC neurons, AM detection in ML approached that found in A1. Pooling only DEC neurons resulted in impaired AM detection in both areas. To investigate the role of DEC neurons, we devised two pooling methods that opposed DEC and INC neurons-a direct subtractive method and a two-pool push-pull opponent method. Only the push-pull opponent method resulted in superior AM detection relative to indiscriminate pooling. In the active condition, the opponent method was superior to pooling only INC neurons during the late portion of the response in ML. These results suggest that the increasing prevalence of the DEC response type in ML can be leveraged by appropriate methods to improve AM detection. We used several post hoc pooling models to investigate the ability of primate auditory cortex to leverage population coding in the detection of amplitude-modulated sounds. When cells are indiscriminately pooled, primary auditory cortex (A1) detects amplitude-modulated sounds better than middle-lateral belt (ML). When cells that decrease firing rate with increasing modulation depth are excluded, or used in a push-pull opponent fashion, detection is similar in the two areas, and macaque behavior can be approximated using reasonably sized pools.
我们在恒河猴区分调幅噪声(AM)与未调制噪声或被动聆听相同刺激时,记录了初级听觉皮层(A1)和中外侧带区域(ML)的神经元活动。我们使用了几种事后合并模型来研究听觉皮层利用群体编码进行AM检测的能力。我们发现,在主动条件下,基于池化响应的AM检测比被动条件下更好,并且基于速率编码比基于同步编码更好。根据神经元对调制深度增加的反应是增加(INC)还是减少(DEC)其放电率,可将神经元分为两类。在这些样本中,A1中DEC神经元(26%)的比例相对低于ML(45%)。当不区分这些类别进行响应合并时,基于速率编码的AM检测在A1中比在ML中要好得多,但当仅合并INC神经元时,ML中的AM检测接近A1中的水平。仅合并DEC神经元会导致两个区域的AM检测受损。为了研究DEC神经元的作用,我们设计了两种使DEC和INC神经元相互对立的合并方法——直接减法方法和双池推挽对立方法。只有推挽对立方法相对于无差别合并能实现更好的AM检测。在主动条件下,在ML中响应的后期,对立方法优于仅合并INC神经元的方法。这些结果表明,可以通过适当的方法利用ML中DEC反应类型的增加来改善AM检测。我们使用了几种事后合并模型来研究灵长类动物听觉皮层在检测调幅声音时利用群体编码的能力。当细胞无差别合并时,初级听觉皮层(A1)比中外侧带(ML)能更好地检测调幅声音。当排除随着调制深度增加而放电率降低的细胞,或以推挽对立方式使用时,两个区域的检测效果相似,并且使用合理大小的池可以近似猕猴的行为。