Hassanzai M, Bahmany S, van Onzenoort H A W, van Oldenrijk J, Koch B C P, de Winter B C M
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Apr 2;80(4):1097-1107. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf041.
A drawback of vancomycin use is the need for therapeutic drug monitoring and renal function monitoring. Traditional blood sampling involves drawing blood through a venepuncture. An alternative method, dried blood spot (DBS) sampling allows for self-sampling at home.
To clinically validate a DBS method for simultaneous monitoring of vancomycin and creatinine.
Hospitalized adults treated with intravenous vancomycin were included (trial registration NCT05257070). Blood sampling consisted of one venepuncture and one finger prick. Whole-blood DBS samples from patients were obtained by applying one drop of whole blood onto Whatman 903 filtrate paper. Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess the agreement and bias between the two measurements. Patients were asked to state their preferences for one of the two sampling methods.
The study involved a final analysis of 39 patient samples for the clinical validation of vancomycin and 46 patient samples for the clinical validation of creatinine. The difference between plasma and DBS concentrations was ≤20% for 77% of the vancomycin samples, the mean bias was -0.1379% (95% limit of agreement -5.899-5.623). The difference between plasma and DBS concentrations was ≤20% for 89% of the creatinine samples, the mean bias was 2.656% (95% limit of agreement -26.16-31.47). Most patients (18 out of 31) preferred a finger prick over a venepuncture and 12 patients indicated no preference.
This is the first study that successfully clinically validated a DBS sampling method for simultaneous measurement of vancomycin and creatinine, allowing for direct use in (outpatient) practice.
使用万古霉素的一个缺点是需要进行治疗药物监测和肾功能监测。传统的血液采样是通过静脉穿刺抽血。另一种方法是干血斑(DBS)采样,它允许患者在家中自行采样。
临床验证一种用于同时监测万古霉素和肌酐的DBS方法。
纳入接受静脉注射万古霉素治疗的住院成人(试验注册号NCT05257070)。血液采样包括一次静脉穿刺和一次手指针刺。通过将一滴全血滴在沃特曼903滤纸上获得患者的全血DBS样本。采用Bland-Altman分析评估两种测量方法之间的一致性和偏差。询问患者对两种采样方法之一的偏好。
该研究最终分析了39份用于万古霉素临床验证的患者样本和46份用于肌酐临床验证的患者样本。77%的万古霉素样本血浆浓度与DBS浓度之间的差异≤20%,平均偏差为-0.1379%(95%一致性界限为-5.899至5.623)。89%的肌酐样本血浆浓度与DBS浓度之间的差异≤20%,平均偏差为2.656%(95%一致性界限为-26.16至31.47)。大多数患者(31名中的18名)更喜欢手指针刺而非静脉穿刺,12名患者表示无偏好。
这是第一项成功临床验证用于同时测量万古霉素和肌酐的DBS采样方法的研究,该方法可直接用于(门诊)实践。