Uchida Yuichiro, Takahara Takeshi, Kawase Takahisa, Mizumoto Takuya, Nakauchi Masaya, Nishimura Akihiro, Mii Satoshi, Fukuoka Hirotaka, Taniwaki Shinichi, Iwama Hideaki, Kojima Masayuki, Uyama Ichiro, Suda Koichi
Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan.
Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;59:102195. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102195. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
The use of the hinotori™ Surgical System (hinotori) in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is new compared to the da Vinci™ Surgical System (DVSS). The hinotori is equipped with mechanisms distinct from those of DVSS, and comprehensive reports detailing the surgical techniques and outcomes associated with hinotori in DP (hinotori-DP) are lacking. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of DP using the hinotori and DVSS (Xi system), focusing on differences in settings and techniques between the two methods.
This study retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent robotic DP from April 2010 (the introduction of robotic DP at our institute) to July 2024. The analysis excluded patients who underwent spleen-preserving procedures or procedures performed using robotic platform other than hinotori or daVinci Xi. The hinotori-DP cases were compared with those performed using DVSS (DVSS-DP). The techniques used in hinotori-DP were examined in more detail.
A total of 75 robotic DP cases (11 with hinotori and 64 with DVSS) were analyzed in this study. Different port configurations and techniques, including a lesser curvature approach, were used in the hinotori-DP compared to DVSS-DP. The operation time was relatively shorter in the hinotori-DP group (299 vs. 366 min, p = 0.095), and the postoperative complication rates were comparable (pancreatic fistula: 27 % vs. 30 %, p = 0.871; Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3a complications: 18 % vs. 19 %, p = 0.964) between the two groups.
The hinotori-DP can be safely performed by focusing on the unique characteristics of the hinotori surgical system.
与达芬奇手术系统(DVSS)相比,hinotori™手术系统(hinotori)在胰体尾切除术(DP)中的应用尚属新颖。hinotori配备了与DVSS不同的机制,目前缺乏详细介绍与hinotori相关的胰体尾切除术(hinotori-DP)手术技术和结果的综合报告。本研究旨在比较使用hinotori和DVSS(Xi系统)进行胰体尾切除术的结果,重点关注两种方法在设置和技术上的差异。
本研究回顾性调查了2010年4月(我院引入机器人胰体尾切除术)至2024年7月期间接受机器人胰体尾切除术的连续患者。分析排除了接受保脾手术或使用除hinotori或达芬奇Xi以外的机器人平台进行的手术的患者。将hinotori-DP病例与使用DVSS进行的病例(DVSS-DP)进行比较。对hinotori-DP中使用的技术进行了更详细的检查。
本研究共分析了75例机器人胰体尾切除病例(11例使用hinotori,64例使用DVSS)。与DVSS-DP相比,hinotori-DP采用了不同的端口配置和技术,包括小弯侧入路。hinotori-DP组的手术时间相对较短(299分钟对366分钟,p = 0.095),两组术后并发症发生率相当(胰瘘:27%对30%,p = 0.871;Clavien-Dindo≥3a级并发症:18%对19%,p = 0.964)。
关注hinotori手术系统的独特特性,可以安全地进行hinotori-DP。