Crielaard Loes, Brown Andrew D, Nicolaou Mary, Hayward Joshua, Stronks Karien, Allender Steven
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Faculty of Health, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 19;15(2):e087195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087195.
Systems approaches (SAs) seek to understand the dynamics behind system behaviour and formulate effective actions given these dynamics. In public health, SAs often rely on qualitative systems maps visualising factors and their interconnections, frequently developed through group model building. Quantitative system dynamics models (SDMs) can offer additional insights: SDMs can simulate how system behaviour would change if we were to make an adjustment to the system, in what-if scenarios. We explored what (added) value Australian community leaders involved in SAs see in an SDM for understanding a system and its behaviour.
The Whole of Systems Trial of Prevention Strategies for Childhood Obesity (WHOSTOPS), a community-level collaboration between researchers and community leaders in South-Western Victoria, Australia.
We calibrated an existing small and high-level SDM with local data from the WHOSTOPS communities, so that the simulations pertained to their local context. The SDM was developed to simulate potential interventions addressing either social norms regarding body weight or individual weight-related behaviour. We presented the SDM to the community leaders via an interactive interface in an online workshop.
We calibrated the SDM using WHOSTOPS' baseline measurement (2015), with an 80% participation rate among eligible children (1792/2516). 11 community leaders participated in the workshop.
The community leaders' first impression of the SDM was that it could be a valuable additional tool, particularly because of its ability to compare what-if scenarios resembling individual vs systems perspectives, intuitive presentation of simulation results, and use of local data.
Our preliminary exploration showed that the small and high-level SDM, using what-if scenarios reflecting interventions on different system levels, could contribute to the understanding and communication of (community-based) SAs.
系统方法旨在理解系统行为背后的动态变化,并根据这些动态制定有效的行动方案。在公共卫生领域,系统方法通常依赖于定性系统图来可视化各种因素及其相互联系,这些图往往是通过群体模型构建来完成的。定量系统动力学模型(SDM)能够提供更多见解:SDM可以模拟如果我们对系统进行调整,系统行为将会如何变化,即情景分析。我们探究了参与系统方法的澳大利亚社区领袖认为SDM对于理解一个系统及其行为有何(附加)价值。
儿童肥胖预防策略全系统试验(WHOSTOPS),这是澳大利亚维多利亚州西南部研究人员与社区领袖之间的社区层面合作项目。
我们使用来自WHOSTOPS社区的本地数据对现有的小型高级SDM进行校准,以使模拟与当地情况相关。该SDM旨在模拟针对体重相关社会规范或个体体重相关行为的潜在干预措施。我们在在线研讨会上通过交互式界面将SDM展示给社区领袖。
我们使用WHOSTOPS的基线测量数据(2015年)对SDM进行校准,符合条件的儿童参与率为80%(1792/2516)。11名社区领袖参加了研讨会。
社区领袖对SDM的第一印象是,它可能是一个有价值的附加工具,特别是因为它能够比较类似于个体视角与系统视角的情景分析、直观呈现模拟结果以及使用本地数据。
我们的初步探索表明,使用反映不同系统层面干预措施的情景分析的小型高级SDM,有助于理解和交流(基于社区的)系统方法。