Suppr超能文献

工作记忆限制对句法和语义加工的不同影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。

Differential effects of working memory constraints on syntactic and semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs.

作者信息

Nakamura Megan, Rossi Eleonora

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Stage College, PA 16802, USA.

Department of Linguistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2025 May;264:105550. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105550. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is essential for language comprehension. It enables us to retain and manipulate information, track context, and recall key details. While WM's role in syntactic processing is well-established, its impact on semantic processing is less clear.WM resources are allocated based on task demands, with syntactic processing-requiring the maintenance and manipulation of hierarchical dependencies-placing higher demands on WM. The present study uses electroencephalography (EEG) to examine how WM constraints impact syntactic and semantic processing. Monolingual English speakers completed a Sentence Judgment Task (SJT). Participants were assigned to two groups: the NonMemory group completed the SJT alone, while the Memory group performed a dual-task version requiring them to memorize a sequence of three words and monitor the sentences for these words. Event-related potential (ERP) results reveal a diminished P600 effect for syntactic violations in the Memory group, suggesting reduced sensitivity to syntactic errors under WM constraints. In contrast, no significant group differences for the N400 were observed for semantic violations, indicating that semantic processing may be less affected by WM limitations. This study advances our understanding of the role of WM in language processing and highlights how WM constraints differentially impact syntactic vs semantic processing. Insights from this research can inform how the brain adapts to varying WM demands, such as in second language processing, where prioritizing semantic over syntactic processing may be necessary to optimize limited cognitive resources.

摘要

工作记忆(WM)对于语言理解至关重要。它使我们能够保留和处理信息、追踪上下文并回忆关键细节。虽然工作记忆在句法处理中的作用已得到充分确立,但其对语义处理的影响尚不清楚。工作记忆资源是根据任务需求分配的,句法处理需要维护和处理层次依赖关系,对工作记忆的要求更高。本研究使用脑电图(EEG)来检验工作记忆限制如何影响句法和语义处理。以英语为母语的单语者完成了句子判断任务(SJT)。参与者被分为两组:非记忆组单独完成句子判断任务,而记忆组执行双重任务版本,要求他们记住三个单词的序列并在句子中监测这些单词。事件相关电位(ERP)结果显示,记忆组中句法违规的P600效应减弱,这表明在工作记忆限制下对句法错误的敏感性降低。相比之下,对于语义违规,未观察到两组之间N400的显著差异,这表明语义处理可能受工作记忆限制的影响较小。这项研究推进了我们对工作记忆在语言处理中作用的理解,并突出了工作记忆限制如何不同地影响句法与语义处理。这项研究的见解可以为大脑如何适应不同的工作记忆需求提供信息,例如在第二语言处理中,为了优化有限的认知资源,可能有必要优先处理语义而非句法。

相似文献

1
Differential effects of working memory constraints on syntactic and semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs.
Brain Lang. 2025 May;264:105550. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105550. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
6
Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese.
Brain Lang. 2013 Jul;126(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 3.
7
Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 6;1093(1):178-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.094. Epub 2006 May 4.
8
The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;1142:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.030. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
9
Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 May;13(3):339-56. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00127-6.
10
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:23-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063. Epub 2006 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The Critical Role of Semantic Working Memory in Language Comprehension and Production.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021 Aug;30(4):283-291. doi: 10.1177/0963721421995178. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
2
Functional Role of the N400 and P600 in Language-Related ERP Studies with Respect to Semantic Anomalies: An Overview.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Jan 27;58(3):249-252. doi: 10.29399/npa.27422. eCollection 2021.
3
Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.
Brain Res. 2021 Aug 1;1764:147466. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147466. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Working Memory and Attention - A Conceptual Analysis and Review.
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 8;2(1):36. doi: 10.5334/joc.58.
5
The roles of alpha oscillation in working memory retention.
Brain Behav. 2019 Apr;9(4):e01263. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1263. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
6
Working Memory and Executive Attention: A Revisit.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):190-193. doi: 10.1177/1745691617720478.
8
On the Proper Treatment of the N400 and P600 in Language Comprehension.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 2;8:1327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01327. eCollection 2017.
9
A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing.
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6(Suppl Suppl 6):1318-1352. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12461. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验