Massey Zachary B, Anbari Allison B, Wang Na, Adediran Abigail, Lawrie LaRissa L, Martinez Priscilla, McCarthy Denis
TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;49(3):665-677. doi: 10.1111/acer.70003. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
This study sought to identify effective health warnings about alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk among young adult female participants.
We tested a pool of health warnings in a national pilot study. We used the most effective designs from the pilot in the main experiment where young (ages 21-29) U.S. adult female participants (N = 1038) reporting past 30-day alcohol consumption were randomly assigned into 1 of 4 conditions where they viewed a health warning about (1) mortality, (2) mastectomy, (3) hair loss, or (4) control (non-health warning message). Participants were then randomly assigned to view 1 of 2 message types within each condition: text-only or pictorial. Warnings were shown apart from products. Outcomes were message reactions (attention to and cognitive elaboration of warnings, fear, hope, and perceived message effectiveness), attitudes and beliefs (perceived severity and susceptibility to alcohol harms, and perceived response and self-efficacy to prevent alcohol harms), and behavioral intentions to stop or to reduce alcohol consumption in the next month.
Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) models testing between warning conditions showed estimated marginal means (EMM) for every health warning condition were significantly higher than the control for attention (control = 5.80 vs. mortality = 6.63, mastectomy = 6.81, hair loss = 6.83, all ps < 0.05), fear (control = 2.45 vs. mortality = 4.11, mastectomy = 4.16, hair loss = 4.02, ps < 0.05), perceived message effectiveness (control = 3.44 vs. mortality = 5.75, mastectomy = 5.82, hair loss = 6.09, ps < 0.05), and perceived severity of alcohol harms (control = 5.51 vs. mortality = 6.25, mastectomy = 6.09, hair loss = 6.35, ps < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the health warnings about cancer effects for perceived message effectiveness. EMMs for intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in the next month were significantly higher in the mortality (6.44) and hair loss (6.35) conditions versus control (5.61, ps < 0.05).
Exposure to health warnings about alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk (vs. control) resulted in greater attention, fear, perceived message effectiveness, perceived severity of alcohol harms, and intentions to reduce alcohol consumption.
本研究旨在确定针对年轻成年女性参与者的关于饮酒与乳腺癌风险的有效健康警示。
我们在一项全国性试点研究中测试了一组健康警示。我们将试点中最有效的设计用于主要实验,在该实验中,报告过去30天内饮酒的美国年轻(21 - 29岁)成年女性参与者(N = 1038)被随机分配到4种情况中的一种,她们会看到一条关于(1)死亡、(2)乳房切除术、(3)脱发或(4)对照(非健康警示信息)的健康警示。然后,参与者被随机分配在每种情况下查看2种信息类型中的一种:纯文本或图片。警示与产品分开展示。结果包括信息反应(对警示的关注和认知加工、恐惧、希望以及感知到的信息有效性)、态度和信念(感知到的酒精危害的严重性和易感性,以及感知到的预防酒精危害的反应和自我效能),以及下个月停止或减少饮酒的行为意图。
在警示条件之间进行测试的多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)模型显示,每种健康警示条件下的估计边际均值(EMM)在注意力方面显著高于对照组(对照组 = 5.80,死亡警示 = 6.63,乳房切除术警示 = 6.81,脱发警示 = 6.83,所有p值 < 0.05)、恐惧方面(对照组 = 2.45,死亡警示 = 4.11,乳房切除术警示 = 4.16,脱发警示 = 4.02,p值 < 0.05)、感知到的信息有效性方面(对照组 = 3.44,死亡警示 = 5.75,乳房切除术警示 = 5.82,脱发警示 = 6.09,p值 < 0.05),以及感知到的酒精危害的严重性方面(对照组 = 5.51,死亡警示 = 6.25,乳房切除术警示 = 6.09,脱发警示 = 6.35,p值 < 0.05)。关于癌症影响的健康警示在感知到的信息有效性方面没有显著差异。下个月减少饮酒意图的EMM在死亡警示(6.44)和脱发警示(6.35)条件下显著高于对照组(5.61,p值 < 0.05)。
接触关于饮酒与乳腺癌风险的健康警示(与对照组相比)导致了更多的关注、恐惧、感知到的信息有效性、感知到的酒精危害的严重性,以及减少饮酒的意图。