Suppr超能文献

虚拟现实或基于个人电脑的妇科盆腔检查模拟:医学生的偏好

Virtual reality or personal computer-based gynecologic pelvic exam simulation: medical student preferences.

作者信息

Plotzker Rosalyn E, Harmon Derek J, Kanellitsas Tim, Klein Barbie A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), 550 16thStreet, Mission Hall, Box 0560, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Division of Anatomy, 440 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06757-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gynecologic pelvic exams (GPEs) are a required proficiency for healthcare trainees, yet practice opportunities are limited. The Virtual Approach to Gynecology Project aims to supplement traditional learning with a virtual-based GPE module. This study compares trainee experiences using the immersive virtual reality (VR) version to an equivalent non-immersive personal computer (PC) simulation.

METHODS

Five groups of 3-5 preclinical medical students were randomized to complete one version of the GPE simulation (either the PC or VR), followed by written feedback and a structured focus group. Each group then completed the other version, after which a second written feedback form was completed, and a final focus group conducted. Focus group comments were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded. Thematic analysis was performed on coded comments and analysis of written feedback compared Likert-scale responses of VR and PC versions.

RESULTS

Twenty-two individual students enrolled and were assigned to one of five groups. Focus group discussions yielded a total of 138 responses that underwent thematic analysis. VR was unanimously preferred to the PC version, scoring significantly higher Likert-scale responses on ease of use, realism, improved comfort, and confidence. The following 3 themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) realism and immersiveness, (2) ease of use, and (3) enjoyment. Compared to PC, VR was found to be more realistic and enjoyable, though both versions had some reported difficulty regarding use.

CONCLUSION

The immersive VR-based simulation provided a more realistic and enjoyable experience for the GPE simulation compared to the PC-based simulation and was unanimously preferred.

摘要

背景

妇科盆腔检查(GPEs)是医护学员必须掌握的技能,但实践机会有限。妇科虚拟教学项目旨在通过基于虚拟的GPE模块来补充传统学习。本研究比较了学员使用沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)版本与等效的非沉浸式个人计算机(PC)模拟的体验。

方法

将五组3至5名临床前医学生随机分组,使其完成一个版本的GPE模拟(PC或VR),随后进行书面反馈和结构化焦点小组讨论。然后每组完成另一个版本,之后再完成第二份书面反馈表,并进行最后的焦点小组讨论。记录焦点小组的评论,逐字转录并编码。对编码后的评论进行主题分析,并对书面反馈进行分析,比较VR和PC版本的李克特量表反应。

结果

22名学生报名参加并被分配到五组中的一组。焦点小组讨论共产生了138条反应,对其进行了主题分析。VR被一致认为优于PC版本,在易用性、真实感、舒适度提高和信心方面的李克特量表反应得分显著更高。主题分析产生了以下三个主题:(1)真实感和沉浸感,(2)易用性,(3)趣味性。与PC相比,VR被认为更具真实感和趣味性,不过两个版本在使用方面都有一些困难报告。

结论

与基于PC的模拟相比,基于沉浸式VR的模拟为GPE模拟提供了更真实、更有趣的体验,并且得到了一致的青睐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a49a/11849286/4cd230605d6f/12909_2025_6757_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3.
6
Immersive virtual reality in orthopedic surgery as elective subject for medical students : First experiences in curricular teaching.
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 May;53(5):369-378. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04491-w. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
8
Insights into enhanced learning through virtual reality.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;55(4):101767. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101767. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
10
Virtual reality-based simulation improves gynecologic brachytherapy proficiency, engagement, and trainee self-confidence.
Brachytherapy. 2021 Jul-Aug;20(4):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2024 Apr;35(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Using Virtual Reality to Teach Medical Students Cross-Coverage Skills.
Am J Med. 2024 May;137(5):454-458. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Assessment of Basic Thoracic Ultrasound Skills in Immersive Virtual Reality: Gathering Validity Evidence.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Apr;50(4):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.12.002. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
4
Teaching Airway Management Using Virtual Reality: A Scoping Review.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Apr 1;138(4):782-793. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006611. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
5
What influences GPs' use of pelvic examination? A qualitative investigation in primary care.
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jun 29;73(732):e528-e536. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0363. Print 2023 Jul.
6
Medical students' perception of the application of a virtual reality training model to acquire vaginal examination skills.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;161(3):827-832. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14670. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Use of Extended Reality in Medical Education: An Integrative Review.
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Dec 19;33(1):275-286. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01698-4. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Immersive Virtual Reality for Surgical Training: A Systematic Review.
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:40-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.045. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
10
Improving Medical Student Comfort and Competence in Performing Gynecological Exams: A Systematic Review.
Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1353-1365. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004128.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验