Yang Pengfei, Yang Fu, Wang Qi, Fang Fang, Yu Qian, Tai Rui
School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Oct 16;12(1):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.10.012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
This systematic review aimed to assess the properties and feasibility of existing risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome outcomes in adult survivors of critical illness.
As of November 1, 2023, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, Wanfang database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were searched. Following the literature screening process, we extracted data encompassing participant sources, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) outcomes, sample sizes, missing data, predictive factors, model development methodologies, and metrics for model performance and evaluation. We conducted a review and classification of the PICS domains and predictive factors identified in each study. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was employed to assess the quality and applicability of the studies.
This systematic review included a total of 16 studies, comprising two cognitive impairment studies, four psychological impairment studies, eight physiological impairment studies, and two studies on all three domains. The discriminative ability of prediction models measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68-0.90. The predictive performance of most models was excellent, but most models were biased and overfitted. All predictive factors tend to encompass age, pre-ICU functional impairment, in-ICU experiences, and early-onset new symptoms.
This review identified 16 prediction models and the predictive factors for PICS. Nonetheless, due to the numerous methodological and reporting shortcomings identified in the studies under review, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting the predictions made by these models. To avert the development of PICS, it is imperative for clinicians to closely monitor prognostic factors, including the in-ICU experience and early-onset new symptoms.
本系统评价旨在评估现有危重症成年幸存者重症监护后综合征结局风险预测模型的特性和可行性。
截至2023年11月1日,检索了考克兰图书馆、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、PsycInfo、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed)、万方数据库和维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)。在文献筛选过程之后,我们提取了包括参与者来源、重症监护后综合征(PICS)结局、样本量、缺失数据、预测因素、模型开发方法以及模型性能和评估指标在内的数据。我们对每项研究中确定的PICS领域和预测因素进行了综述和分类。采用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具评估研究的质量和适用性。
本系统评价共纳入16项研究,包括两项认知障碍研究、四项心理障碍研究、八项生理障碍研究以及两项涵盖所有三个领域的研究。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积衡量的预测模型的辨别能力为0.68 - 0.90。大多数模型的预测性能良好,但大多数模型存在偏倚和过度拟合问题。所有预测因素往往包括年龄、重症监护病房前功能障碍、重症监护病房内经历以及早期出现的新症状。
本综述确定了16个PICS预测模型和预测因素。尽管如此,由于在所审查的研究中发现了众多方法学和报告方面的缺陷,临床医生在解释这些模型所做的预测时应谨慎。为避免PICS的发生,临床医生必须密切监测预后因素,包括重症监护病房内经历和早期出现的新症状。