Chen Diana A, Gibbons Melissa M
Department of Integrated Engineering, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;10(2):102. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10020102.
This study draws upon bio-inspiration from anatomical sutures found in hard structures, such as turtle shells, to explore if impact energy can be dissipated through geometric parameterization rather than relying on energy-absorbing materials. While previous finite element analysis studies identified optimal dovetail suture geometries for maximizing the global stiffness and toughness of archway structures, this paper explores how different suture geometries might optimize localization effects through segmentation to isolate damage caused by the propagation of strain energy. We compare the global toughness of each suture geometry to its scaling factor, defined as the ratio of strain energy in the center segment(s) of the archway over the total strain energy absorbed during deformation, normalized by the expected strain energy consistent with uniform volumetric distribution. Our findings indicate that the scaling factor tended to correlate positively with global toughness, suggesting that suture geometries that performed well globally would also exhibit the localization effect. However, there is some nuance in selecting suture geometries that perform well for both metrics, as well as ensuring that geometries that perform well for one type of segmentation are still structurally sound in others, due to little control over where impact may occur, relative to the location of a suture, in real scenarios.
本研究借鉴了在诸如龟壳等硬结构中发现的解剖缝合线的生物启发,以探索冲击能量是否可以通过几何参数化来耗散,而不是依赖于能量吸收材料。虽然先前的有限元分析研究确定了使拱道结构的整体刚度和韧性最大化的最佳燕尾缝合线几何形状,但本文探讨了不同的缝合线几何形状如何通过分割来优化局部化效应,以隔离由应变能传播引起的损伤。我们将每种缝合线几何形状的整体韧性与其缩放因子进行比较,缩放因子定义为拱道中心段的应变能与变形过程中吸收的总应变能之比,并通过与均匀体积分布一致的预期应变能进行归一化。我们的研究结果表明,缩放因子往往与整体韧性呈正相关,这表明在整体上表现良好的缝合线几何形状也会表现出局部化效应。然而,在选择对这两个指标都表现良好的缝合线几何形状时,以及确保对于一种分割类型表现良好的几何形状在其他分割类型中仍然结构合理时,存在一些细微差别,因为在实际场景中,相对于缝合线的位置,几乎无法控制冲击可能发生的位置。