Milacek Christopher, Bal Christina, Starzengruber Peter, Zehetmayer Sonja, Idzko Marco, Gompelmann Daniela
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Division for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;15(4):469. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040469.
Bronchial wash for microbiological cultivation and/or multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is often routinely performed during bronchoscopy independent of the indication for bronchoscopy. This study aimed to determine and compare the pathogen spectrum evaluated by culture and PCR in bronchial secretion samples with regard to the underlying lung pathology. In this retrospective analysis, microbiological results from bronchial washes performed from February 2022 to September 2022 were collected in 245 patients (48.2% male, mean age 63.0 ± 13.9 years). Samples were assessed for bacteria/fungi culture and reported depending on the underlying pathology. Additional PCR was performed in 216 patients and compared to the results of the culture. Cultivation and PCR revealed positive results in 20% and 24.5% of the cases, respectively. Microbiological culture most likely revealed a positive result in patients with hemoptysis (44.4%) and pulmonary infections (29.6%) among various indications for bronchoscopy, and PCR most likely identified a pathogen in patients with hemoptysis (66.7%) and COPD (36.4%). Active smoking and an increased CRP were revealed as significant predictors for a positive culture ( < 0.0001 and = 0.021). The concordance rate between culture and PCR for identifying pathogenic microorganisms was 84.3%, resulting in a moderate agreement (kappa coefficient 0.54 [95% CI: 0.34-0.68]). PCR and culture moderately agreed, showing additional PCR testing only to be beneficial if restricted to proper indications, providing rapid diagnosis and therefore leading to immediate therapeutic decisions.
支气管灌洗用于微生物培养和/或多重聚合酶链反应(PCR),通常在支气管镜检查期间常规进行,与支气管镜检查的指征无关。本研究旨在确定并比较在支气管分泌物样本中,通过培养和PCR评估的病原体谱与潜在肺部病理学之间的关系。在这项回顾性分析中,收集了2022年2月至2022年9月对245例患者(48.2%为男性,平均年龄63.0±13.9岁)进行支气管灌洗的微生物学结果。对样本进行细菌/真菌培养评估,并根据潜在病理学情况进行报告。另外对216例患者进行了PCR检测,并与培养结果进行比较。培养和PCR分别在20%和24.5%的病例中显示出阳性结果。在支气管镜检查的各种指征中,微生物培养在咯血患者(44.4%)和肺部感染患者(29.6%)中最有可能显示阳性结果,而PCR在咯血患者(66.7%)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者(36.4%)中最有可能鉴定出病原体。主动吸烟和C反应蛋白升高被发现是培养阳性的显著预测因素(<0.0001和=0.021)。培养和PCR在鉴定致病微生物方面的一致性率为84.3%,结果为中度一致(kappa系数0.54[95%CI:0.34 - 0.68])。PCR和培养中度一致,表明只有在限于适当指征的情况下进行额外的PCR检测才有益,可提供快速诊断并因此导致立即的治疗决策。