Pistelli Lorenzo, Di Cori Andrea, Parollo Matteo, Torre Marco, Fiorentini Federico, Barletta Valentina, Giannotti Santoro Mario, Grifoni Gino, Canu Antonio, Segreti Luca, De Lucia Raffaele, Viani Stefano, Zucchelli Giulio
Department of Cardiac-Thoracic and Vascular, Second Division of Cardiology, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 7;14(4):1052. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041052.
Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are widely used for the diagnosis of unexplained syncope, palpitations, and cryptogenic stroke. While ILRs demonstrate clinical utility, data on their diagnostic yield and value in real-world settings remain limited. This study evaluates ILR performance, diagnostic yield, and clinical impact across multiple indications. We retrospectively analyzed 316 patients who underwent ILR implantation between 2017 and 2023 at a single center. Indications included unexplained syncope, palpitations, and atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. Diagnostic yield, defined as the ratio of positive diagnoses to implants, and diagnostic value, defined as diagnoses leading to therapeutic changes, were assessed. Diagnostic appropriateness, reflecting diagnoses consistent with implant indications, was also investigated. Continuous variables were analyzed using an independent samples -test or ANOVA, when appropriate; dichotomous variables were analyzed using a chi-square test. The overall diagnostic yield was 30%, with most diagnoses occurring within 24 months post-implantation. Bradyarrhythmias were diagnosed earlier (mean: 290 days) than tachyarrhythmias (590 days, = 0.04). The diagnostic value was 29%, and the appropriateness reached 70%. The diagnostic-value-to-diagnostic-yield ratio was shown to be as high as 97%, suggesting that whenever a diagnosis was made, it was of clinical impact. Patients with presyncope showed a higher diagnostic yield, particularly for tachyarrhythmias. Device re-implantation showed limited utility, as only one diagnosis (classified as bystander) was achieved in 32 re-implanted patients. After 900 days, the diagnostic yield decreased significantly, with the number needed to follow (NNF) rising from 3.85 to 18 ( < 0.001). ILRs are effective for arrhythmia detection, demonstrating significant diagnostic and therapeutic impact, particularly within the first two years. The recurrence of presyncope and atrial dilation was associated with higher yields, while isolated syncope posed diagnostic challenges. Prolonged monitoring beyond 900 days and device re-implantation provided diminishing returns.
植入式循环记录仪(ILR)广泛用于不明原因晕厥、心悸和隐源性卒中的诊断。虽然ILR具有临床实用性,但关于其在实际临床中的诊断率及价值的数据仍然有限。本研究评估了ILR在多种适应症中的性能、诊断率及临床影响。我们回顾性分析了2017年至2023年在单一中心接受ILR植入的316例患者。适应症包括不明原因晕厥、心悸和房颤(AF)检测。评估了诊断率(定义为阳性诊断数与植入数之比)和诊断价值(定义为导致治疗改变的诊断)。还研究了与植入适应症相符的诊断的诊断适宜性。连续变量在适当情况下使用独立样本t检验或方差分析进行分析;二分变量使用卡方检验进行分析。总体诊断率为30%,大多数诊断在植入后24个月内出现。缓慢性心律失常的诊断时间较早(平均:290天),快性心律失常的诊断时间为590天(P = 0.04)。诊断价值为29%,适宜性达到70%。诊断价值与诊断率之比高达97%,表明一旦做出诊断,就具有临床意义。前驱晕厥患者的诊断率较高,尤其是对于快速性心律失常。再次植入ILR的效用有限,因为在32例再次植入的患者中仅获得了1例诊断(归类为旁观者诊断)。900天后,诊断率显著下降,随访所需病例数(NNF)从3.85增加到18(P < 0.001)。ILR对心律失常检测有效,具有显著的诊断和治疗影响,尤其是在头两年内。前驱晕厥和心房扩大的复发与较高的诊断率相关,而孤立性晕厥则带来诊断挑战。超过900天的长期监测和再次植入ILR的回报递减。