Suppr超能文献

为什么关键事件检查表在围手术期环境中并非总是被使用?一项回顾性调查。

Why are critical event checklists not always used in the perioperative setting?: A retrospective survey.

作者信息

Clebone Anna, Klock P Allan, Choi Ellen Y, Tung Avery

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0314774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314774. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During surgery and anesthesia, life-threatening critical events, including cardiac arrest, may occur. By facilitating recall of key management steps, suggesting diagnostic possibilities, and providing dose and drug information, cognitive aids may improve clinician performance during such events. In actual clinical practice, however, cognitive aids may be available but inconsistently used. One possibility explaining aid non-use during critical events is a lack of familiarity with how cognitive aids may be helpful. We hypothesized that introduction of critical event cognitive aids along with implementation of cognitive aid resources would change the quantitative incidence of cognitive aid use and qualitative reasons for aid non-use. We surveyed members of an academic anesthesia department before and after implementation of critical event cognitive aid resources.

METHODS

All anesthesia clinicians at a single academic medical center were surveyed. Participants were surveyed both pre- and post-training with a focused program to introduce critical event cognitive aid resources. Incidences of and reasons for cognitive aid use and non-use were collected and analyzed. Survey responses were compared pre- and post-implementation.

RESULTS

The response rate was 64.5%. One-hundred eighty-five reasons for non-use were collected before the focused program and 149 after. Overall, 80% of clinicians had encountered at least one critical event during the study period and use of cognitive aids during all reported events was 7%. Six categories of reasons for non-use were identified: 'Not Available', 'Not Needed', 'No Time', 'Another Person In Charge', 'Used In Another Way', 'No Reason Given'. After implementation, a decrease in the number of respondents who cited availability and who cited 'another person running crisis,' as reasons for non-use was observed (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of cognitive aids for critical events in an academic anesthesia environment improved the perception of cognitive aid availability and decreased the number of subjects who chose to not use the aid due to another person running the crisis response. Looking at the multiple reasons for cognitive aid non-use may guide implementation, training, and design.

摘要

引言

在手术和麻醉过程中,可能会发生危及生命的重大事件,包括心脏骤停。通过促进对关键管理步骤的回忆、提示诊断可能性以及提供剂量和药物信息,认知辅助工具可能会改善临床医生在此类事件中的表现。然而,在实际临床实践中,认知辅助工具可能存在但使用并不一致。一种解释在重大事件中不使用辅助工具的可能性是缺乏对认知辅助工具如何发挥作用的熟悉程度。我们假设引入重大事件认知辅助工具并实施认知辅助资源将改变认知辅助工具使用的定量发生率以及不使用辅助工具的定性原因。我们在实施重大事件认知辅助资源之前和之后对一个学术麻醉科的成员进行了调查。

方法

对一家学术医疗中心的所有麻醉临床医生进行了调查。参与者在接受一项重点介绍重大事件认知辅助资源的培训项目前后都接受了调查。收集并分析了认知辅助工具使用和不使用的发生率及原因。比较了实施前后的调查回复。

结果

回复率为64.5%。在重点项目实施前收集到185条不使用的原因,实施后为149条。总体而言,80%的临床医生在研究期间至少遇到过一次重大事件,在所有报告事件中认知辅助工具的使用率为7%。确定了六类不使用的原因:“没有”、“不需要”、“没时间”、“另有人负责”、“以其他方式使用”、“未给出原因”。实施后,观察到将可用性和“另有人应对危机”作为不使用原因的受访者数量有所减少(p < 0.001)。

结论

在学术麻醉环境中实施重大事件认知辅助工具改善了对认知辅助工具可用性的认知,并减少了因另有人应对危机而选择不使用辅助工具的受试者数量。审视认知辅助工具不使用的多种原因可能会指导实施、培训和设计。

相似文献

1
Why are critical event checklists not always used in the perioperative setting?: A retrospective survey.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0314774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314774. eCollection 2025.
4
Malignant Hyperthermia Preparedness Training: Using Cognitive Aids and Emergency Checklists in the Perioperative Setting.
J Perianesth Nurs. 2022 Feb;37(1):24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.09.020. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
The Ryder Cognitive Aid Checklist for Trauma Anesthesia.
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1484-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001186.
8
The timing of cognitive aid access during simulated pediatric intraoperative critical events.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Jun;30(6):676-682. doi: 10.1111/pan.13868. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
Bringing Perioperative Emergency Manuals to Your Institution: A "How To" from Concept to Implementation in 10 Steps.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Mar;45(3):170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

2
The effect of cognitive aid design on the perceived usability of critical event cognitive aids.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Mar;64(3):378-384. doi: 10.1111/aas.13503. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
3
Matching design to use: a task analysis comparison of three cognitive aid designs used during simulated crisis management.
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;66(6):658-671. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01325-8. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Adherence to advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) guidelines during in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes.
Resuscitation. 2018 Aug;129:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
6
More Than a Tick Box: Medical Checklist Development, Design, and Use.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):223-232. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002286.
8
Hospital checklists are meant to save lives - so why do they often fail?
Nature. 2015 Jul 30;523(7562):516-8. doi: 10.1038/523516a.
9
Emergency manual implementation: can brief simulation-based or staff trainings increase familiarity and planned clinical use?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 May;41(5):212-20. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41028-1.
10
Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest.
Anesthesiology. 2014 Apr;120(4):829-38. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000153.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验