Mervis Joshua E, Kuhney Franchesca S, Russell Madisen T, Kinney Kyle, Olino Thomas M, Mittal Vijay A, Schiffman Jason, Ellman Lauren M
Temple University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, USA.
University of Illinois, Chicago, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Mar;183:296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.02.004. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Poor insight is common in persons with psychosis, but treatment can improve insight. Individuals with psychosis who exhibit better insight have better social functioning, reduced negative symptoms, and paradoxically worse depression. There is limited research investigating insight among persons at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR). Understanding the relationship between insight, social functioning, negative symptoms, and depression might inform treatment. We focused on introspective bias (IB), the overestimation or underestimation of social functioning. Persons with CHR (N = 36), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD; N = 164), and community controls (N = 60) were recruited from the Multisite Assessment of Psychosis-risk Study and completed clinical interviews and self-report instruments. The estimation type was operationalized by whether a person was above or below the standardized mean difference between self-reported and interviewer-rated social functioning. We hypothesized that 1) persons at CHR would have less depressive symptom severity than those with MDD diagnoses, but more depressive symptom severity than control participants accounting for IB within diagnostic groups, 2) CHR and MDD participants would endorse higher levels of negative symptoms, viewed transdiagnostically (e.g., anhedonia, avolition), than controls but not each other, 3) overestimators would endorse higher levels of negative symptoms and depression than underestimators, 4) CHR participants would have the greatest proportions of overestimators, MDD would have the greatest proportion of underestimators, and control participants would have equal proportions of under- and overestimators. Those at CHR had more overestimators, overestimators overall had worse depression and negative symptoms, and diagnostic group membership did not impact the effects of IB on symptoms. This study suggests that IB has clinically relevant correlates but is not a primary treatment target for persons at CHR.
洞察力缺失在精神病患者中很常见,但治疗可以改善洞察力。洞察力较好的精神病患者具有更好的社会功能,阴性症状减少,且矛盾的是,抑郁症状更严重。关于临床高危精神病患者(CHR)洞察力的研究有限。了解洞察力、社会功能、阴性症状和抑郁之间的关系可能有助于治疗。我们关注内省偏差(IB),即对社会功能的高估或低估。从多中心精神病风险评估研究中招募了CHR患者(N = 36)、重度抑郁症(MDD;N = 164)患者和社区对照组(N = 60),并完成了临床访谈和自我报告工具。通过一个人自我报告的社会功能与访谈者评定的社会功能之间的标准化平均差异高于或低于该差异来操作化估计类型。我们假设:1)CHR患者的抑郁症状严重程度低于MDD诊断患者,但在诊断组内考虑到IB的情况下,其抑郁症状严重程度高于对照组参与者;2)CHR和MDD参与者在跨诊断(例如,快感缺失、意志缺乏)方面会比对照组认可更高水平的阴性症状,但彼此之间不会;3)高估者会比低估者认可更高水平的阴性症状和抑郁;4)CHR参与者中高估者的比例最大,MDD参与者中低估者的比例最大,对照组参与者中低估者和高估者的比例相等。CHR患者中有更多的高估者,总体而言高估者的抑郁和阴性症状更严重,诊断组成员身份并未影响IB对症状的影响。这项研究表明,IB具有临床相关的关联,但不是CHR患者的主要治疗靶点。