van Rijn Claudia, Abdoel Charmane, Baktawar Shanti, Herbel Petra, Jünschke Anja, Bryant Michelle, Kitchen Steve, Scalambrino Erica, Clerici Marigrazia, Stavelin Anne, Meijer Piet, Cobbaert Christa M, van den Besselaar Antonius M H P
Coagulation Reference Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Mar 3;63(7):1327-1335. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1446. Print 2025 Jun 26.
Detailed technical instructions have been made for harmonization of the prothrombin time (PT) test using the manual tilt tube technique (MTT). The MTT has been proposed as the reference measurement procedure for PT and international normalized ratio (INR). An external quality assessment (EQA) scheme has been developed specifically for calibration laboratories performing the harmonized MTT. Here we report the results of the first 10 surveys of this new EQA scheme and investigate whether there is improvement in performance over time and in comparison with previous studies.
Four deep-frozen plasma samples with different PT levels were dispatched to 4 European laboratories. PT's were determined by eight operators. All operators used the same PT reagent (recombinant human). Various measures of PT variation were defined, i.e. within-operator, within-survey, within-run, between-operator, and between-survey coefficient of variation. Between-operator variation (CV) was calculated from the each operator's mean PT.
The median within-operator variation of all operators varied from 1.3 to 2.3 %. Some operators improved their performance, others did not. Between-operator CV (CV) ranged from 1.0 to 2.2 %. Overall, the between-operator and within-operator variation using the harmonized MTT was lower than in a previously published multicentre calibration study. Overall, the within-operator variation was low and did not change significantly over time.
within-operator and between-operator variation of the PT measured with the harmonized MTT were low when compared with previous studies. The results suggest that the average within-operator variation of the eight operators in this study is as low as possible.
已制定详细的技术说明,以统一使用手动倾斜管技术(MTT)进行的凝血酶原时间(PT)检测。MTT已被提议作为PT和国际标准化比值(INR)的参考测量程序。已专门为执行统一MTT的校准实验室制定了外部质量评估(EQA)方案。在此,我们报告了这项新EQA方案前10次调查的结果,并调查与以往研究相比,随着时间推移性能是否有所改善。
将四个PT水平不同的深度冷冻血浆样本分发给4个欧洲实验室。由八名操作人员测定PT。所有操作人员使用相同的PT试剂(重组人源)。定义了PT变异的各种测量指标,即操作人员内、调查内、批内、操作人员间和调查间变异系数。操作人员间变异(CV)根据每个操作人员的平均PT计算得出。
所有操作人员的操作人员内变异中位数在1.3%至2.3%之间。一些操作人员提高了他们的表现,另一些则没有。操作人员间CV范围为1.0%至2.2%。总体而言,使用统一MTT的操作人员间和操作人员内变异低于先前发表的多中心校准研究。总体而言,操作人员内变异较低,且随时间没有显著变化。
与以往研究相比,使用统一MTT测量的PT的操作人员内和操作人员间变异较低。结果表明,本研究中八名操作人员的平均操作人员内变异尽可能低。