Talay Burcu Cihan, Kızıltunç Emrullah, Yılmaz Canan, Osmanov Zakir, Ünlü Serkan, Candemir Mustafa, Sezenöz Burak, Göbüt Özden Seçkin, Topal Salih, Türkoğlu Sedat
Department of Cardiology, Bilecik Bozüyük State Hospital, 11300 Bilecik, Turkey.
Department of Cardiology, Gazi University School of Medicine, 06560 Ankara, Turkey.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 21;26(2):26364. doi: 10.31083/RCM26364. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Fibulin 1 and Fibulin 2 are members of the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein family. ECMs drive prognosis through remodeling, a key step in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). We aimed to compare Fibulin 1 and 2 levels in different stages of HF and to investigate their relationship with other prognostic factors of HF.
Patients with HF were divided into two groups according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced and non-reduced LVEF. The control and patient groups consisted of individuals with Stages A and B HF, Stages C and D HF, respectively. Fibulin levels were measured at different stages of HF and in the control group. Additionally, Fibulin levels were measured at admission, discharge, and in the first month in patients who were hospitalized due to decompensated HF.
Serum Fibulin 1 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. Serum Fibulin 2 levels were similar between the groups. Although serum Fibulin 2 levels were similar at repeated measurements, serum Fibulin 1 and NT-proBNP levels significantly decreased at discharge and remained similar at 1 month compared with admission. There was a significant positive correlation between Fibulin 1 and NT-proBNP levels and a significant negative correlation between Fibulin 1 levels and LVEF. Fibulin 2 levels were not correlated with LVEF and NT-proBNP.
Our study demonstrated that serum Fibulin 1 levels differ among different HF stages and have a similar temporal change as observed for NT-proBNP levels. A similar association was not observed for Fibulin 2 in our study.
纤连蛋白1和纤连蛋白2是细胞外基质(ECM)糖蛋白家族的成员。细胞外基质通过重塑推动预后,而重塑是心力衰竭(HF)发病机制中的关键步骤。我们旨在比较心力衰竭不同阶段的纤连蛋白1和2水平,并研究它们与心力衰竭其他预后因素的关系。
根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)将心力衰竭患者分为两组:LVEF降低组和LVEF未降低组。对照组和患者组分别由A期和B期心力衰竭、C期和D期心力衰竭患者组成。在心力衰竭的不同阶段以及对照组中测量纤连蛋白水平。此外,对因失代偿性心力衰竭住院的患者在入院时、出院时和第一个月测量纤连蛋白水平。
患者组血清纤连蛋白1和N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)水平显著高于对照组。两组间血清纤连蛋白2水平相似。尽管重复测量时血清纤连蛋白2水平相似,但与入院时相比,出院时血清纤连蛋白1和NT-proBNP水平显著降低,且在1个月时保持相似。纤连蛋白1与NT-proBNP水平呈显著正相关,纤连蛋白1水平与LVEF呈显著负相关。纤连蛋白2水平与LVEF和NT-proBNP均无相关性。
我们的研究表明,血清纤连蛋白1水平在不同心力衰竭阶段存在差异,并且与NT-proBNP水平具有相似的时间变化。在我们的研究中,未观察到纤连蛋白2有类似的关联。