Jun Dahae J, Shannon Rebecca, Tschida Katherine, Smith David M
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, 211 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 United States.
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, 211 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 United States.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2025 May;219:108038. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108038. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a key role in memory and behavioral flexibility, and a growing body of evidence suggests that the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subregions contribute differently to these processes. Studies of fear conditioning and goal-directed learning suggest that the PL promotes behavioral responses and memory retrieval, while the IL inhibits them. Other studies have shown that the mPFC is engaged under conditions of high interference. This raises the possibility that the PL and IL play differing roles in resolving interference. To examine this, we first used chemogenetics (DREADDs) to suppress mPFC neuronal activity and tested subjects on a conditional discrimination task known to be sensitive to muscimol inactivation. After confirming the effectiveness of the DREADD procedures, we conducted a second experiment to examine the PL and IL roles in a high interference memory task. We trained rats on two consecutive sets of conflicting odor discrimination problems, A and B, followed by test sessions involving a mid-session switch between the problem sets. Controls repeatedly performed worse on Set A, suggesting that learning Set B inhibited the rats' ability to retrieve Set A memories (i.e. retroactive interference). PL inactivation rats performed similarly to controls. However, IL inactivation rats did not show this effect, suggesting that the IL plays a critical role in suppressing the retrieval of previously acquired memories that may interfere with retrieval of more recent memories. These results suggest that the IL plays a critical role in memory control processes needed for resolving interference.
内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)在记忆和行为灵活性方面起着关键作用,越来越多的证据表明,前边缘(PL)和下边缘(IL)亚区域对这些过程的贡献有所不同。恐惧条件反射和目标导向学习的研究表明,PL促进行为反应和记忆提取,而IL则抑制它们。其他研究表明,mPFC在高干扰条件下会被激活。这就增加了PL和IL在解决干扰方面发挥不同作用的可能性。为了对此进行研究,我们首先使用化学遗传学(DREADDs)来抑制mPFC神经元活动,并在一个已知对蝇蕈醇失活敏感的条件辨别任务中对受试者进行测试。在确认DREADD程序的有效性后,我们进行了第二个实验,以研究PL和IL在高干扰记忆任务中的作用。我们训练大鼠连续进行两组相互冲突的气味辨别问题,A组和B组,随后进行测试,测试过程中在两组问题之间进行中途切换。对照组在A组上的表现反复较差,这表明学习B组抑制了大鼠提取A组记忆的能力(即逆向干扰)。PL失活的大鼠表现与对照组相似。然而,IL失活的大鼠没有表现出这种效应,这表明IL在抑制可能干扰最近记忆提取的先前获得的记忆的提取方面起着关键作用。这些结果表明,IL在解决干扰所需的记忆控制过程中起着关键作用。