Tarbi Elise C, Schuler Susanna L, Ambrose Natalie, Hutchinson Rebecca N, Reblin Maija, Cheung Katharine L
Department of Nursing, University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Vermont Conversation Lab, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 3;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01700-x.
While telehealth may offer promise for accessible, efficient palliative care delivery, leveraging telehealth technologies as an opportunity to better understand and advance the science of palliative care communication has been less well explored. Without identifying solutions to overcome challenges to conducting research in the virtual environment, we are unable to conduct the foundational work to offer evidence-based recommendations for high-quality telehealth, particularly in the context of palliative care. Our objective is to highlight methodological challenges in the use of telehealth for the study of palliative care communication and share lessons learned from using these methods.
This paper is the result of a reflective process and experience across three ongoing observational communication research studies focused on the use of telehealth during serious illness. These research datasets have been collected from multiple sites and represent rural and urban telehealth palliative care consultations for patients receiving dialysis (n = 34), patients with cancer (n = 13), and seriously ill, home-bound patients (n = 9). We illustrate challenges, insights, and recommendations with case studies from these studies.
We identify key challenges, and offer recommendations to address them, in telehealth palliative care communication research. Key insights fall within three themes: 1) addressing accessibility barriers to enrollment in telehealth research; 2) technical considerations regarding how software and hardware choices have implications for data collection and analysis; and 3) ethical considerations regarding the nuances of consent and privacy in telehealth encounters.
Overall, our approach demonstrates possibilities for the use of telehealth to study palliative care communication and provides a "how-to" example for unique telehealth considerations from data collection through analysis. These strategies can facilitate success with large-scale health communication research studies in the telehealth context.
虽然远程医疗有望提供可及、高效的姑息治疗服务,但利用远程医疗技术来更好地理解和推进姑息治疗沟通科学的研究较少。如果无法找到解决在虚拟环境中开展研究面临的挑战的方法,我们就无法开展基础工作,为高质量的远程医疗提供循证建议,尤其是在姑息治疗背景下。我们的目标是突出在使用远程医疗研究姑息治疗沟通时面临的方法学挑战,并分享使用这些方法所获得的经验教训。
本文是对三项正在进行的观察性沟通研究的反思过程和经验的结果,这些研究聚焦于在重病期间使用远程医疗。这些研究数据集是从多个地点收集的,代表了针对接受透析的患者(n = 34)、癌症患者(n = 13)以及重病居家患者(n = 9)的农村和城市远程医疗姑息治疗咨询。我们用这些研究中的案例来说明挑战、见解和建议。
我们确定了远程医疗姑息治疗沟通研究中的关键挑战,并提出了应对这些挑战的建议。关键见解可归纳为三个主题:1)解决远程医疗研究入组的可及性障碍;2)关于软件和硬件选择如何影响数据收集和分析的技术考量;3)关于远程医疗会诊中同意和隐私细微差别的伦理考量。
总体而言,我们的方法展示了利用远程医疗研究姑息治疗沟通的可能性,并提供了一个从数据收集到分析的独特远程医疗考量的“操作指南”示例。这些策略有助于在远程医疗背景下成功开展大规模健康沟通研究。