Suppr超能文献

评估病灶内注射麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗及维生素D3治疗疣疗效的随机对照研究

Randomized Comparative Study Assessing the Efficacy of Intralesional Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine and Vitamin D3 in Treating Warts.

作者信息

Sushantika Sushantika, Singh Nripendra

机构信息

Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.

Community Medicine, Maharaja Suhel Dev Autonomous State Medical College and Mahrishi Balark Hospitals, Bahraich, Bahraich, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Feb 1;17(2):e78337. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78337. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Warts are benign skin growths caused by variants of human papillomavirus that infect the superficial layers of the skin and penetrate epithelial cells, causing viral multiplication. Warts can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact and cause significant discomfort and embarrassment. There are multiple treatment options for warts, including topical therapies, cryotherapy, laser vaporization, surgical excision, and oral agents (e.g., zinc, retinoid, levamisole). In recent years, immunotherapy with various antigens has successfully treated multiple lesions by combining a targeted approach with upregulation of the host's immune system. This study explores and compares the efficacy of two immunotherapy options to treat warts: vitamin D3 and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

METHODOLOGY

A randomized prospective comparative study was conducted to determine the efficacy of intralesional vitamin D3 and MMR vaccine in patients suffering from warts. The study population was categorized into two groups. The patients were divided into two equal groups, Group A (MMR; n=90) and Group B (vitamin D3; n=90), using a computer-generated random number table after applying the allocation concealment method to segregate participants and then allocated into either group using the sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope (SNOSE) technique. One group received intralesional vitamin D3, and the other received intralesional MMR vaccine. Researchers followed up with patients for three months after completion of their therapy to notice any relapse. The outcomes considered in our study were recovery (complete, partial, and no recovery) and side effects such as pain, burning sensation, and desquamation. The statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States).

RESULTS

At the end of the study, out of 150 subjects who reached the end, complete clearance was seen in 42/70 (60%) patients in Group A compared to only 26/80 (32.5%) patients showing clearance in Group B after completing six sessions of therapy in either group. Applying the chi-square test, the p-value comes to be 0.001323, so the result is significant at p<0.05. Hence, the MMR vaccine is better than an intralesional injection of vitamin D3 in treating warts.

CONCLUSION

Intralesional MMR vaccine showed a better response than injection of vitamin D3 in treating warts as an immunotherapeutic agent.

摘要

背景

疣是由人乳头瘤病毒变体引起的良性皮肤增生,该病毒感染皮肤表层并侵入上皮细胞,导致病毒繁殖。疣可通过皮肤接触传播,会引起极大不适和尴尬。疣有多种治疗选择,包括局部治疗、冷冻疗法、激光汽化、手术切除和口服药物(如锌、维甲酸、左旋咪唑)。近年来,使用各种抗原的免疫疗法通过将靶向方法与上调宿主免疫系统相结合,成功治疗了多种病变。本研究探讨并比较两种免疫疗法治疗疣的疗效:维生素D3和麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗。

方法

进行了一项随机前瞻性对照研究,以确定病灶内注射维生素D3和MMR疫苗对疣患者的疗效。研究人群分为两组。采用分配隐藏方法将参与者分开后,使用计算机生成的随机数表将患者分为两个相等的组,A组(MMR;n = 90)和B组(维生素D3;n = 90),然后使用连续编号、不透明、密封信封(SNOSE)技术将其分配到任一组。一组接受病灶内注射维生素D3,另一组接受病灶内注射MMR疫苗。治疗结束后,研究人员对患者进行了三个月的随访,以观察是否有复发情况。我们研究中考虑的结果包括恢复情况(完全恢复、部分恢复和未恢复)以及疼痛、烧灼感和脱皮等副作用。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,Version 22(2013年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行统计分析。

结果

在研究结束时,在150名完成研究的受试者中,A组70名患者中有42名(60%)完全清除,而B组80名患者在两组均完成六个疗程的治疗后只有26名(32.5%)显示清除。应用卡方检验,p值为0.——,所以结果在p<0.05时具有显著性。因此,在治疗疣方面,MMR疫苗比病灶内注射维生素D3更好。

结论

作为一种免疫治疗剂,病灶内注射MMR疫苗在治疗疣方面比注射维生素D3显示出更好的反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2939/11874879/e1ab24672694/cureus-0017-00000078337-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验