Suppr超能文献

“以医生为主导,以患者为中心”:一项比较慢性下腰痛患者和医生治疗结果选择的混合方法研究

"Doctor-Led, Patient-Centered": A Mixed-Method Research Comparing Patients' and Doctors' Treatment Outcome Choices for Chronic Low Back Pain.

作者信息

Li Xia, Zhang Ying, Mao Zhuxin, Chen Qianji, Lan Xiaoxue, Chen Hong, Sun Ya-Nan, Yu Chang-He, Wang Xi-You

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Yungang Community Health Service Center of 731 Hospital of Beijing Aerospace Science & Industry Group, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Feb 28;19:433-450. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S501409. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly impacts quality of life. Treatment outcomes are influenced by the perspectives and expectations of both patients and doctors, making it crucial to understand these views to optimize care and satisfaction.

PURPOSE

This study aims to analyze the alignment and differences in doctors' and patients' perceptions of treatment outcomes and explore the implications of these differences.

METHODS

An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used, involving a questionnaire survey and two focus groups. The study was conducted at Dongzhimen Hospital from August 2020 to January 2021. Participants, including patients with any type of CLBP (age≥18) and doctors with at least one year of experience, were selected via purposive sampling. Quantitative data, analyzed with SPSS, were summarized as percentages for categorical variables and as means with standard deviations or medians for continuous variables. Differences between variables were assessed using the Chi-square and nonparametric rank sum tests. Focus group discussions were analyzed thematically to explore differing perspectives on treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

A questionnaire gathered perspectives from 30 patients (mean age 45±11.74 years) and 26 doctors (mean age 41.7±6.7 years). The results informed the development of specific questions for focus group interviews with 8 patients and 8 doctors. Quantitative results revealed that pain/discomfort and activities of daily living were equally important to both groups. However, many outcomes were valued differently. Five themes emerged: 1) Doctors' focus on treating the whole person; 2) Patients' emphasis on cost-effectiveness/satisfaction; 3) Patients' prioritization of body image and physical function; 4) Shared priority beyond pain; 5) Shared concerns on adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of aligning treatment expectations between patients and doctors to improve satisfaction and outcomes in CLBP management. Enhanced communication strategies and shared decision-making are recommended to bridge these gaps.

摘要

背景

慢性下腰痛(CLBP)对生活质量有显著影响。治疗结果受到患者和医生双方观点及期望的影响,因此了解这些观点对于优化护理和提高满意度至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在分析医生和患者对治疗结果认知的一致性和差异,并探讨这些差异的影响。

方法

采用解释性序列混合方法设计,包括问卷调查和两个焦点小组。该研究于2020年8月至2021年1月在东直门医院进行。通过目的抽样选择参与者,包括任何类型CLBP(年龄≥18岁)的患者和至少有一年经验的医生。使用SPSS分析定量数据,分类变量总结为百分比,连续变量总结为均值并带有标准差或中位数。使用卡方检验和非参数秩和检验评估变量之间的差异。对焦点小组讨论进行主题分析,以探索对治疗结果的不同观点。

结果

一份问卷收集了30名患者(平均年龄45±11.74岁)和26名医生(平均年龄41.7±6.7岁)的观点。这些结果为对8名患者和8名医生进行焦点小组访谈的具体问题提供了依据。定量结果显示,疼痛/不适和日常生活活动对两组同样重要。然而,许多结果的重要性被不同看待。出现了五个主题:1)医生关注治疗整个人;2)患者强调成本效益/满意度;3)患者对身体形象和身体功能的优先考虑;4)除疼痛外的共同优先事项;5)对不良事件的共同关注。

结论

本研究强调了使患者和医生之间的治疗期望保持一致对于提高CLBP管理中的满意度和治疗结果的重要性。建议加强沟通策略和共同决策以弥合这些差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bb/11878113/6e08e4f725ec/PPA-19-433-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
6
Treatment satisfaction in Chinese medicine outpatient care: a comparison of patients' and doctors' views.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2729-8.
8
Blood tests in primary care: A qualitative study of communication and decision-making between doctors and patients.
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2453-2461. doi: 10.1111/hex.13564. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Doctors' Attitudes to Patient Question Asking, Patient-Generated Question Lists, and Question Prompt Lists: A Qualitative Study.
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):283-292. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211029579. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Would you do it again? Discrepancies between patient and surgeon perceptions following adult spine deformity surgery.
Spine J. 2023 Aug;23(8):1115-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.018. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Public Health.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:355-373. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052120-012811. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
Development of the CORE-Kids core set of outcome domains for studies of childhood limb fractures.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Dec;103-B(12):1821-1830. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-2321.R2. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
4
Low back pain.
Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):78-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire.
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
6
Concordance Between Patients' and Surgeons' Expectations of Lumbar Surgery.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Feb 15;46(4):249-258. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003775.
7
Pain Education With Therapeutic Exercise in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Rehabilitation: A Critically Appraised Topic.
J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Nov 1;29(8):1204-1209. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0345. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Are Patient and Surgeon Expectations after ACL Reconstruction Realistic?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):619-628. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001082.
9
Prevalence of low back pain in the elderly population: a systematic review.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019 Oct 28;74:e789. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e789. eCollection 2019.
10
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验