Suppr超能文献

一种用于左心耳封堵的膜修饰技术:一项多中心随机对照试验

A Membrane Modification Technique for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Fan Youqi, Ma Dongxing, Wang Changqian, Luo Jun, Ling Zhiyu, Li Shuyan, Peng Xiaoping, Zhang Zheng, Chu Huimin, Wang Jianan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Cardiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JACC Asia. 2025 Mar;5(3 Pt 1):374-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.008. Epub 2025 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously pioneered a negatively ionized polyethylene terephthalate membrane method (the SMART technique) with the LAMax (test) occluder to reduce platelet adhesion and promote endothelialization.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the test occluder with the Watchman 2.5 device (control) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation to reduce stroke risk.

METHODS

Overall, 236 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) (open-label) to the test or control device for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The effectiveness endpoints included 12-month successful left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing with residual flow ≤5 mm and clinical success (composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism). Safety endpoints were also studied. A noninferiority margin of -7% was set between the devices.

RESULTS

The test device was noninferior to the control device for the effectiveness endpoints of successful LAA sealing (test 93.2% vs control 89.8%; P < 0.05) and clinical success (test 93.2% vs control 89.8%; P < 0.05). The 12-month safety endpoints were similar between the 2 devices. The device-related thrombus rates for the control device at the 3- and 12-month visits were 5.7% and 4.6%, respectively; no cases of device-related thrombus occurred with the test device.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that transcatheter LAAO using the SMART technique may effectively and safely prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although further studies with larger sample sizes are needed, this novel technique may prevent device-related thrombus formation and has high potential for application in interventional therapies. (LAMax Vs. Watchman LAAC Device for Subjects With Non-valvular AF to Reduce the Risk of Stroke; NCT04429646).

摘要

背景

我们之前开创了一种使用LAMax(测试)封堵器的负离子聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯膜方法(SMART技术),以减少血小板黏附并促进内皮化。

目的

本研究旨在比较测试封堵器与Watchman 2.5装置(对照)在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中降低中风风险的安全性和有效性。

方法

总共236例患者(开放标签)以1:1的比例随机分配至测试装置组或对照装置组,进行左心耳封堵术(LAAO)。有效性终点包括12个月时左心耳(LAA)成功封堵且残余血流≤5 mm以及临床成功(缺血性中风、短暂性脑缺血发作和全身性栓塞的复合终点)。还研究了安全性终点。设定两种装置之间的非劣效性界值为-7%。

结果

在LAA成功封堵的有效性终点方面(测试组93.2% vs对照组89.8%;P < 0.05)以及临床成功方面(测试组93.2% vs对照组89.8%;P < 0.05),测试装置不劣于对照装置。两种装置在12个月安全性终点方面相似。对照装置在3个月和12个月随访时与装置相关的血栓形成率分别为5.7%和4.6%;测试装置未发生与装置相关的血栓形成病例。

结论

本研究表明,使用SMART技术进行经导管LAAO可有效且安全地预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中风。尽管需要更大样本量的进一步研究,但这种新技术可能预防与装置相关的血栓形成,并且在介入治疗中具有很高的应用潜力。(用于非瓣膜性房颤患者降低中风风险的LAMax与Watchman LAAC装置对比研究;NCT04429646)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae9/11934047/367559e1eb01/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验