Huang Dong, Shao Yu, Wang Ruizhi, Liu Sijia, Zhang Shilei, Bao Shijun
College of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Qingdao Vland Biotech INC., Qingdao, 266102, China.
Poult Sci. 2025 Apr;104(4):104900. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104900. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
To investigate the immunogenic cross-reactivity among different novel duck reovirus isolates, animals immunized with monovalent inactivated duck reovirus were challenged with homologous and heterologous viruses, and serum samples were collected after immunization for cross-neutralization test. The results showed that the virus neutralizing titer against homologous virus was significantly higher than that against heterologous virus(p < 0.000001), which indicated that there was an important difference in antigenicity between DE13 and WL01 strains, which affected the specificity of protective virus neutralizing antibodies induced. This was further confirmed by cross-protection studies in ducks immunized at 2 d of age with whole-virus inactivated oil emulsion vaccines containing DE13 strain or WL01 strain as monovalent vaccine or both strains as bivalent vaccine. Protection against clinical disease with the monovalent vaccine was fully effective against homologous virus challenge at 2 weeks after vaccination, whereas protection against heterologous virus challenge was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Only the bivalent inactivated vaccine containing both strains protected birds against the two novel duck reovirus that cause disease in ducks. The results showed that vaccination of the inactivated vaccine at 2 day of age induced rapid immunity (within 2 weeks after vaccination) with complete clinical protection in ducks, the high level of neutralizing antibody could be maintained until 60 days-old. Pre-laying ducks immunization with two doses of bivalent inactivated vaccine could induce passive immunity in offspring ducks, and 100 % protection could be obtained through maternal antibody, which could be maintained until 21 days of age.
为研究不同新型鸭呼肠孤病毒分离株之间的免疫原交叉反应性,用单价灭活鸭呼肠孤病毒免疫动物后,用同源和异源病毒进行攻毒,并在免疫后采集血清样本进行交叉中和试验。结果显示,针对同源病毒的病毒中和效价显著高于针对异源病毒的效价(p < 0.000001),这表明DE13和WL01毒株之间的抗原性存在重要差异,影响了诱导产生的保护性病毒中和抗体的特异性。这在2日龄鸭用含DE13毒株或WL01毒株的全病毒灭活油乳剂疫苗作为单价疫苗或两种毒株作为双价疫苗进行免疫的交叉保护研究中得到进一步证实。单价疫苗接种后2周对同源病毒攻毒的临床疾病保护完全有效,而对异源病毒攻毒的保护显著较低(p < 0.001)。只有含两种毒株的双价灭活疫苗能保护鸭免受两种导致鸭发病的新型鸭呼肠孤病毒感染。结果表明,2日龄鸭接种灭活疫苗可诱导快速免疫(接种后2周内),对鸭有完全的临床保护作用,高水平的中和抗体可维持至60日龄。产蛋前母鸭用两剂双价灭活疫苗免疫可诱导子代鸭产生被动免疫,通过母源抗体可获得100%的保护,且可维持至21日龄。