Kabisch Stefan, Hajir Jasmin, Sukhobaevskaia Varvara, Weickert Martin O, Pfeiffer Andreas F H
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum für Diabetesforschung e.V., Geschäftsstelle am Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 25;26(5):2000. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052000.
Cohort studies consistently show that a high intake of cereal fiber and whole-grain products is associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. Similar findings are also reported for infectious and chronic inflammatory disorders. All these disorders are at least partially caused by inflammaging, a chronic state of inflammation associated with aging and Metabolic Syndrome. Surprisingly, insoluble (cereal) fiber intake consistently shows stronger protective associations with most long-term health outcomes than soluble fiber. Most humans consume soluble fiber mainly from sweet fruits, which usually come with high levels of sugar, counteracting the potentially beneficial effects of fiber. In both observational and interventional studies, high-fiber diets show a beneficial impact on inflammation, which can be attributed to a variety of nutrients apart from dietary fiber. These confounders need to be considered when evaluating the effects of fiber as part of complex dietary patterns. When assessing specific types of fiber, inulin and resistant starch clearly elicit anti-inflammatory short-term effects, while results for pectins, beta-glucans, or psyllium turn out to be less convincing. For insoluble fiber, promising but sparse data have been published so far. Hypotheses on putative mechanisms of anti-inflammatory fiber effects include a direct impact on immune cells (e.g., for pectin), fermentation to pleiotropic short-chain fatty acids (for fermentable fiber only), modulation of the gut microbiome towards higher levels of diversity, changes in bile acid metabolism, a differential release of gut hormones (such as the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP)), and an improvement of insulin resistance via the mTOR/S6K1 signaling cascade. Moreover, the contribution of phytate-mediated antioxidative and immune-modulatory means of action needs to be considered. In this review, we summarize the present knowledge on the impact of fiber-rich diets and dietary fiber on the human inflammatory system. However, given the huge heterogeneity of study designs, cohorts, interventions, and outcomes, definite conclusions on which fiber to recommend to whom cannot yet be drawn.
队列研究一致表明,高摄入谷类纤维和全谷物产品与2型糖尿病(T2DM)、癌症及心血管疾病风险降低相关。对于感染性和慢性炎症性疾病也有类似发现。所有这些疾病至少部分是由炎症衰老引起的,炎症衰老是一种与衰老和代谢综合征相关的慢性炎症状态。令人惊讶的是,与大多数长期健康结局相比,不溶性(谷类)纤维摄入始终显示出更强的保护关联,而不是可溶性纤维。大多数人主要从甜水果中摄入可溶性纤维,而甜水果通常含糖量高,抵消了纤维的潜在有益作用。在观察性和干预性研究中,高纤维饮食对炎症有有益影响,这可归因于膳食纤维之外的多种营养素。在评估纤维作为复杂饮食模式一部分的作用时,需要考虑这些混杂因素。在评估特定类型的纤维时,菊粉和抗性淀粉明显会引发抗炎短期效应,而果胶、β-葡聚糖或车前子壳的结果则不那么令人信服。对于不溶性纤维,到目前为止已发表的数据虽有前景但较少。关于抗炎纤维效应的假定机制的假说包括对免疫细胞的直接影响(例如对果胶)、发酵产生多效性短链脂肪酸(仅针对可发酵纤维)、使肠道微生物群向更高多样性水平调节、胆汁酸代谢变化、肠道激素(如葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽(GIP))的差异释放以及通过mTOR/S6K1信号级联改善胰岛素抵抗。此外,还需要考虑植酸介导的抗氧化和免疫调节作用方式的贡献。在本综述中,我们总结了目前关于富含纤维的饮食和膳食纤维对人体炎症系统影响的知识。然而,鉴于研究设计、队列、干预措施和结局的巨大异质性,目前还无法就推荐哪种纤维给哪些人得出明确结论。