Suppr超能文献

验光领域的人工智能:现状与未来展望

Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.

作者信息

Krishnan Anantha, Dutta Ananya, Srivastava Alok, Konda Nagaraju, Prakasam Ruby Kala

机构信息

School of Medical Sciences, Science Complex, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Standard Chartered - LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

出版信息

Clin Optom (Auckl). 2025 Mar 12;17:83-114. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S494911. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes-28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.

摘要

随着全球眼科护理专业人员短缺以及视力损害负担日益加重,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家,迫切需要创新解决方案来弥合眼科护理服务差距。近几十年来,人工智能(AI)的进步对医疗保健产生了重大影响,包括验光领域。当人工智能融入验光工作流程时,它有可能简化决策过程并提高系统效率。为了实现这一潜力,开发能够改善患者护理工作流程各个阶段(包括筛查、检测、诊断和管理)的人工智能模型至关重要。本综述探讨了人工智能在验光中的应用,重点关注其优化患者护理各个方面的潜力。我们研究了验光关键领域的人工智能模型。我们的分析考虑了关键参数,包括模型选择、训练和验证的样本量、评估指标以及模型的可解释性。这一全面综述确定了现有人工智能模型的优势和劣势。大多数基于图像的研究使用卷积神经网络(CNN)或迁移学习模型,而基于临床数据的研究主要采用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)。一般来说,在大型数据集上训练的人工智能模型具有更高的准确率。然而,许多专注于验光的模型由于样本量不足而面临局限性——28%的研究在少于500个样本上进行训练,18%使用少于200个样本,超过一半的研究在少于500个样本上验证其模型,38%在少于200个样本上进行验证。此外,一些在训练和验证中使用相同数据的研究出现了过拟合,导致准确率降低。值得注意的是,20%的纳入研究报告准确率低于80%,限制了它们在临床环境中的实际适用性。本综述为验光师提供了有关该领域人工智能模型优势和劣势的宝贵见解,有助于他们在临床环境中明智地应用这些模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df50/11910921/72f22a44c60c/OPTO-17-83-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验