Cruz Stephanie M, Hameedi Sophia, Sbragia Lourenco, Ogunleye Oluseyi, Diefenbach Karen, Isaacs Albert M, Etchegaray Adolfo, Olutoye Oluyinka O
The Fetal Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1402. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051402.
Fetal surgery has made significant strides over the past 40 years, facilitated by advances in technology and imaging modalities enabling the diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies in utero. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS), a multicenter randomized controlled trial, established open fetal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair as the gold standard for improving neurological outcomes compared to postnatal repair. However, this approach is associated with increased maternal complications and preterm birth due to hysterotomy, prompting the exploration of minimally invasive alternatives. Due to the lack of an existing randomized control trial with fetoscopic MMC repair and variations in technique (percutaneous versus laparotomy/transuterine access, different trocar configurations, closure methods, and patch applications) among different fetal centers, more studies are needed to optimize this approach as an alternative to the standard of care. This paper proposes to assess the basics tenets of open fetal MMC repair and to establish guiding principles for a fetoscopic approach that could prove to be equivalent or superior to open fetal MMC repair in maternal and fetal outcomes and lead to clinical implementation.
在过去40年里,胎儿手术取得了重大进展,这得益于技术和成像方式的进步,使得子宫内先天性异常的诊断和治疗成为可能。多中心随机对照试验“脊髓脊膜膨出管理研究”(MOMS)确定,与出生后修复相比,开放性胎儿脊髓脊膜膨出(MMC)修复是改善神经学预后的金标准。然而,由于子宫切开术,这种方法会增加母体并发症和早产的风险,促使人们探索微创替代方案。由于缺乏关于胎儿镜下MMC修复的现有随机对照试验,且不同胎儿中心在技术上存在差异(经皮与剖腹术/经子宫入路、不同的套管针配置、闭合方法和补片应用),因此需要更多研究来优化这种方法,使其成为标准治疗方案的替代选择。本文建议评估开放性胎儿MMC修复的基本原理,并为胎儿镜手术方法制定指导原则,这种方法在母婴结局方面可能被证明等同于或优于开放性胎儿MMC修复,并能实现临床应用。