Du Yan Yi Lance, Gelfand Michele J, Drasgow Fritz
U Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Graduate School of Business and Psychology, Stanford University.
J Couns Psychol. 2025 Mar;72(2):136-147. doi: 10.1037/cou0000784.
Vocational interests are an important factor in individuals' career choice and development. However, current understanding about the vocational interests of sexual minorities is underdeveloped. Using data from 31,348 men and 59,715 women (N = 91,063) from 48 countries who self-identified as heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual, or asexual, this study used a fine-grained approach to investigating the relationship of sexual orientation to Holland's realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional interests, separately by gender. Across these countries, we also explored how the strength of social norms-that is, cultural tightness-looseness-moderates this relationship. Results indicated generally small sexual orientation differences in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional interests within women and within men. On average, the interests of sexual minorities tend to be less gender-typical, but more investigative and artistic, than those of heterosexual people. Multilevel analyses show that cultural tightness-looseness moderated sexual orientation differences in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional interests, such that some of these differences are smaller (larger) in tight (loose) cultures. This implies that tight cultures that have strong norms might constrain sexual minorities' vocational interests, whereas loose cultures that have weak norms offer greater latitude for them to pursue different interests. Altogether, this study advances our collective understanding of sexual minorities' vocational interests and highlights the role of the cultural context in shaping their career choices and development. Implications for counseling and career development of sexual minority clients are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
职业兴趣是个人职业选择和发展的一个重要因素。然而,目前对于性少数群体职业兴趣的了解尚不完善。本研究使用了来自48个国家的31348名男性和59715名女性(N = 91063)的数据,这些人自我认定为异性恋、同性恋、双性恋或无性恋,采用了一种细粒度的方法,分别按性别调查性取向与霍兰德的现实型、研究型、艺术型、社会型、企业型和传统型兴趣之间的关系。在这些国家中,我们还探讨了社会规范的强度——即文化的松紧程度——如何调节这种关系。结果表明,在女性和男性中,现实型、研究型、艺术型、社会型、企业型和传统型兴趣方面,性取向差异总体较小。平均而言,性少数群体的兴趣往往比异性恋者的兴趣更少具有性别典型性,但更具研究性和艺术性。多层次分析表明,文化的松紧程度调节了现实型、研究型、艺术型、社会型、企业型和传统型兴趣方面的性取向差异,使得在紧密(宽松)文化中,其中一些差异更小(更大)。这意味着具有强大规范的紧密文化可能会限制性少数群体的职业兴趣,而规范较弱的宽松文化为他们追求不同兴趣提供了更大的空间。总之,本研究推进了我们对性少数群体职业兴趣的总体理解,并突出了文化背景在塑造他们的职业选择和发展中的作用。讨论了对性少数群体客户咨询和职业发展的启示。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)