Erven Jolijn A M, Mattiangeli Valeria, Dreshaj Merita, Mullin Victoria E, Rossi Conor, Daly Kevin G, Jackson Iseult, Parker Pearson Mike, Bradley Daniel G, Frantz Laurent A F, Madsen Ole, Raemaekers Daan, Çakirlar Canan
Groningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, Groningen 9712 ER, Netherlands.
Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 VF25, Ireland.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 25;122(12):e2410235122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410235122. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
The relationship between humans and pigs has changed dramatically since their domestication in southwest Asia and subsequent human-induced introduction into Europe. Introgression between incoming southwest Asian pigs and European boar resulted in the gradual replacement of southwest Asian ancestry in European pigs. However, we currently lack genomic data required to explore the regional trajectories, nature, and extent of contact between European boar and pigs that led to this turnover, and how this process was facilitated by human activity. We addressed this deficit by sequencing four Mesolithic boar and seven Neolithic pig samples from six archaeological sites in the Netherlands and Britain ranging from the Mesolithic (5500 BCE) to Neolithic (2500 BCE). Our data show that despite continuous gene flow with European boar, Neolithic European pigs show varying levels of southwest Asian ancestry. The low and varying southwest Asian ancestry in pigs from the Early Neolithic Dutch settlement Swifterbant indicates a high contribution of wild ancestry. The genetic profile, enriched δN values, on-site presence, and wide size distribution of Swifterbant suggest a commensal relationship. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) imply that both closed-breeding and free-ranging management occurred in Neolithic communities, where the former showed an extreme burden of long segments of ROH. We further show selection signatures, associated with coat color and behavior, in Neolithic herds despite recurrent wild gene flow. Altogether, our results show distinct husbandry practices through space and time in Neolithic Europe, with heavy reliance on boar recruitment via the commensal pathway in northwest Europe.
自猪在亚洲西南部被驯化并随后被人类引入欧洲以来,人类与猪的关系发生了巨大变化。来自亚洲西南部的猪与欧洲野猪的基因渗入导致欧洲猪中亚洲西南部血统逐渐被取代。然而,我们目前缺乏探索导致这种更替的欧洲野猪与猪之间的区域轨迹、接触性质和程度所需的基因组数据,以及人类活动如何促进这一过程的数据。我们通过对来自荷兰和英国六个考古遗址的四个中石器时代野猪和七个新石器时代猪样本进行测序来解决这一不足,这些样本的年代从中石器时代(公元前5500年)到新石器时代(公元前2500年)。我们的数据表明,尽管与欧洲野猪持续存在基因流动,但新石器时代的欧洲猪显示出不同程度的亚洲西南部血统。新石器时代早期荷兰定居点斯威夫特班特的猪中亚洲西南部血统较低且各不相同,这表明野生血统的贡献很大。斯威夫特班特丰富的δN值、现场存在情况以及广泛的体型分布表明其存在共生关系。纯合子片段(ROH)表明新石器时代社区中既存在封闭繁殖管理,也存在自由放养管理,其中前者显示出长片段ROH的极端负担。我们进一步表明,尽管存在反复的野生基因流动,但新石器时代猪群中存在与毛色和行为相关的选择特征。总之,我们的结果表明新石器时代欧洲在空间和时间上存在不同的饲养方式,在欧洲西北部严重依赖通过共生途径引入野猪。