Enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition in the management of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) presents a significant challenge to oral intake after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Strategies such as enteral feeding via nasojejunal tube, feeding jejunostomy (FJ), and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) are commonly used to optimize postoperative nutrition. However, the routine use of FJ in PD remains controversial. This study assesses the effectiveness of enteral feeding versus TPN in the management of POPF.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing classical PD at a tertiary care centre in eastern India between July 2019 and July 2024. Patients were randomly allocated to FJ and non-FJ groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoints were procedure-related complications (POPF, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, bile leak, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3), hospital stay, additional costs and 30-day mortality in patients with clinically relevant POPF.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 50 underwent routine FJ placement, and 50 did not. Most POPF cases were Grade B (34% versus 24%). Subgroup analysis of patients with clinically relevant POPF revealed that FJ placement significantly reduced fistula duration (3.8 versus 5.2 weeks, P < 0.001), intra-abdominal drain duration (26.4 versus 34.9 days, P < 0.001), hospital stay (7.9 versus 9.9 days, P < 0.001) and cost expenses (1301 ± 524 versus 1982 ± 441, P < 0.001). There were no differences in complication rates, reoperations, readmissions or 30-day mortality. FJ placement was not associated with adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Routine FJ is a safe and cost-effective strategy for PD patients requiring prolonged nutritional support.