• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童听觉感知测试的心理测量特性:信度与效度分析

Psychometric Properties of the Children's Auditory Perception Test: Reliability and Validity Analysis.

作者信息

Icoz Ozlem, Isikhan Selen Yilmaz, Yucel Esra

机构信息

Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2025 Mar;15(3):e70301. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70301.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.70301
PMID:40111078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11924279/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to revise and investigate the validity and reliability of the Children's Auditory Perception Test (CIAT), which was developed to evaluate auditory perception skills.

METHODS

The study included 100 cochlear implant (CI) users between the ages of 2 and 15, and 80 individuals with normal hearing. In the first session, participants underwent the Turkish Early Language Development Test (TELD-3) and audiometric assessments. The second session involved administering age-appropriate subtests from the CIAT battery. Subtest reliability was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest methods. We measured the construct validity by examining the relationships between subcategories. Also, we evaluated known-group validity and predictive validity.

RESULTS

The reliability analysis of the CIAT indicated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.913 for all 17 tests. Subcategories demonstrated reliability ranging from acceptable to excellent (α = 0.741-0.973). Significant differences were observed in auditory perception scores between children with CI and those with normal hearing (p < 0.005), demonstrating the known-group validity of the test across different age groups. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that factors such as age group, gender, special education duration, receptive and expressive language ages, CI duration, and usage status accounted for 78% of the variability in auditory perception scores (R = 0.78), thus testing the predictive reliability of the model.

CONCLUSION

A valid and reliable test battery that evaluates auditory perception skills at different difficulty levels across a wide age range (2-15 years) has been introduced to the literature. However, a notable limitation is that this battery does not include auditory processing assessments, such as speech-in-competition (noise/babble) tests, which could enhance the comprehensiveness of the evaluation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在修订并调查儿童听觉感知测试(CIAT)的有效性和可靠性,该测试旨在评估听觉感知技能。

方法

本研究纳入了100名年龄在2至15岁之间的人工耳蜗(CI)使用者和80名听力正常的个体。在第一阶段,参与者接受了土耳其早期语言发展测试(TELD - 3)和听力评估。第二阶段涉及对CIAT测试组中适合年龄的子测试进行施测。使用内部一致性和重测方法评估子测试的可靠性。我们通过检查子类别之间的关系来测量结构效度。此外,我们评估了已知群体效度和预测效度。

结果

CIAT的可靠性分析表明内部一致性较高,所有17项测试的Cronbach's α系数为0.913。子类别显示出从可接受到优秀的可靠性(α = 0.741 - 0.973)。在CI儿童和听力正常儿童的听觉感知分数上观察到显著差异(p < 0.005),表明该测试在不同年龄组中的已知群体效度。多元线性回归分析显示,年龄组、性别、特殊教育时长、接受性和表达性语言年龄、CI使用时长和使用状态等因素占听觉感知分数变异性的78%(R = 0.78),从而测试了模型的预测可靠性。

结论

已向文献中引入了一个有效且可靠的测试组,可在广泛的年龄范围(2至15岁)内评估不同难度水平的听觉感知技能。然而,一个显著的局限性是该测试组不包括听觉处理评估,如竞争环境下的言语(噪声/嘈杂声)测试,而这些测试可以提高评估的全面性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa83/11924279/b6daee6116e4/BRB3-15-e70301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa83/11924279/b6daee6116e4/BRB3-15-e70301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa83/11924279/b6daee6116e4/BRB3-15-e70301-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Children's Auditory Perception Test: Reliability and Validity Analysis.儿童听觉感知测试的心理测量特性:信度与效度分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Mar;15(3):e70301. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70301.
2
Validation of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire in cochlear implanted infants and toddlers.小儿人工耳蜗植入婴幼儿中LittlEARS听觉问卷的验证
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Feb;93:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.12.024. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
3
Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls.听力损失儿童与年龄和性别匹配的对照组儿童的韵律感知与产出
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):283-294. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16001.
4
Development of a Mandarin Expressive and Receptive Vocabulary Test for children using cochlear implants.使用人工耳蜗的儿童普通话表达和接受词汇测试的发展。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3526-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
5
Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.华盛顿大学音乐感知临床评估测试的开发与验证
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):411-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0.
6
Comparing the effect of auditory-only and auditory-visual modes in two groups of Persian children using cochlear implants: a randomized clinical trial.比较两组使用人工耳蜗的波斯儿童中仅听觉模式和视听模式的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep;77(9):1545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
7
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life Questionnaire.《日常生活中的听觉行为问卷》土耳其语版的效度和信度。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Mar 3;31(1):155-165. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00094. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
Language evaluation in children with pre-lingual hearing loss and cochlear implant.儿童语言评估:语前聋与人工耳蜗植入
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;86(1):91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
9
The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Preschool Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life Questionnaire.《学前听力环境土耳其语版本问卷的效度与信度及对生活质量的思考》
Am J Audiol. 2024 Jun 4;33(2):343-353. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJA-23-00033. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
10
Children with Auditory Brainstem Implant: How Do They Perform in Motor and Language Skills?人工耳蜗植入患儿的运动和语言技能表现如何?
Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(3):173-181. doi: 10.1159/000510584. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
It is time to change the way we think about hearing evaluation.是时候改变我们对听力评估的看法了。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):3261-3264. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08620-1. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Development of the Turkish hearing in noise test for children.土耳其儿童噪声环境下听力测试的制定。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2023 Sep;24(5):235-242. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2023.2179753. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Trends in Performance Using Early Speech Perception Test in Typically Developing Tamil-Speaking Children.使用早期言语感知测试评估正常发育的泰米尔语儿童的表现趋势。
J Audiol Otol. 2022 Oct;26(4):192-197. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00703. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life Questionnaire.《日常生活中的听觉行为问卷》土耳其语版的效度和信度。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Mar 3;31(1):155-165. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00094. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Malformations Before and After Cochlear Implantation: A Cohort Study of 274 Patients.内耳畸形患儿人工耳蜗植入前后的听力学表现:274 例患者的队列研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan;46(1):154-160. doi: 10.1111/coa.13625. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
Effects of Age at Auditory Brainstem Implantation: Impact on Auditory Perception, Language Development, Speech Intelligibility.听觉脑干植入年龄的影响:对听觉感知、语言发展、言语清晰度的影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Jan;41(1):11-20. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002455.
7
Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations.内耳畸形儿童人工耳蜗植入的效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Sep;276(9):2397-2403. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05475-9. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Validation of the Egyptian Arabic Assessment of Auditory Skills development using children with Cochlear Implants.使用人工耳蜗植入儿童对埃及阿拉伯语听觉技能发展评估的验证。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul;122:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
9
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
10
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.