Knowles Gemma, Stanyon Daniel, Yamasaki Syudo, Miyashita Mitsuhiro, Gayer-Anderson Charlotte, Endo Kaori, Usami Satoshi, Niimura Junko, Nakajima Naomi, Baba Kaori, Richards Thai-Sha, Kitisu Jonas, Hashi Adna, Clement-Gbede Karima Shyan, Tettey Niiokani, Davis Samantha, Lowis Katie, Buckley Verity, Moreno-Agostino Dario, Putzgruber Esther, Crudgington Holly, Woodhead Charlotte, Priestley Kristi, Keyes Katherine M, Dyer Jacqui, Ando Shuntaro, Kasai Kiyoto, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa Mariko, Morgan Craig, Nishida Atsushi
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Unit for Mental Health Promotion, Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2025 Apr;9(4):224-233. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00059-8.
Research suggests gender inequalities in adolescent mental health are context dependent and might be preventable through social and structural change. However, variations in the size of gender inequalities in mental health across diverse cultural contexts could be due to incomparable measurement. We aimed to compare a measurement of mental health among young people in Tokyo, Japan, and London, UK, and test the hypothesis that gender inequalities in depressive symptom trajectories are larger in London than in Tokyo.
For this longitudinal cross-cohort study, we extracted responses to the 13-item Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) by young people who participated in three consecutive waves of the Tokyo Teen Cohort (TTC) and the London-based Resilience, Ethnicity and Adolescent Mental Health (REACH) cohorts. We used multigroup and longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis to examine measurement invariance of the SMFQ by cohort, gender, and age. Latent growth curve models were used to estimate and compare mean trajectories of SMFQ from ages 11-16 years among boys and girls, overall, and in each cohort.
7100 young people from TTC and REACH (3587 boys [50·5%] and 3513 girls [49·5%]) were included in the analysis. With the TTC and REACH cohorts combined, we found very strong evidence of differences in SMFQ between boys and girls, with a mean starting level of 0·71 points (95% CI 0·42-0·95) higher and mean rate of change of 0·73 points (95% CI 0·62-0·82) higher in girls versus boys. Among the 4287 participants in REACH (2097 [48·9%] boys and 2190 [51·1%] girls), a difference in SMFQ was evident between boys and girls at age 11-12 years (difference in mean intercepts: 0·75 [95% CI 0·25-1·25]). Among the 2813 participants in TCC (1490 boys [53·0%] and 1323 girls [47·0%]), differences in SMFQ between boys and girls emerged at a later age, between ages 11 years and 14 years, during which SMFQ decreased among boys and increased among girls (mean difference in slopes 0·52 [95% CI 0·40 to 0·65]). The difference in SMFQ between boys and girls widened year-on-year in both cohorts; by age 16 years, the difference in SMFQ between boys and girls in REACH (mean difference in slopes 0·98 [95% CI 0·77 to 1·20]) was around twice as large as in TTC (0·52 [0·40 to 0·65]). The annual rate of increase in SMFQ among girls in REACH (1·1 [95% CI 0·9-1·3]) was around four times greater than among girls in TTC (0·3 [0·2-0·4]). We found little evidence to suggest these differences in gender inequalities were due to incomparable measurement.
Gender inequalities in emotional health among young people are context dependent and might be preventable through social and structural change.
Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, UK Economic and Social Research Council, and European Research Council.
For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
研究表明,青少年心理健康方面的性别不平等取决于具体情境,或许可通过社会和结构变革加以预防。然而,不同文化背景下心理健康方面性别不平等程度的差异可能源于测量方法不可比。我们旨在比较日本东京和英国伦敦年轻人的心理健康测量情况,并检验抑郁症状轨迹方面的性别不平等在伦敦比在东京更大这一假设。
在这项纵向跨队列研究中,我们提取了参与东京青少年队列(TTC)连续三轮以及伦敦的复原力、种族与青少年心理健康(REACH)队列的年轻人对13项简版情绪与感受问卷(SMFQ)的回答。我们使用多组和纵向验证性因素分析来检验SMFQ在队列、性别和年龄方面的测量不变性。潜在增长曲线模型用于估计和比较11至16岁男孩和女孩总体以及各队列中SMFQ的平均轨迹。
分析纳入了来自TTC和REACH的7100名年轻人(3587名男孩[50.5%]和3513名女孩[49.5%])。将TTC和REACH队列合并后,我们发现有非常有力的证据表明男孩和女孩在SMFQ上存在差异,女孩的平均起始水平比男孩高0.71分(95%置信区间0.42 - 0.95),平均变化率比男孩高0.73分(95%置信区间0.62 - 0.82)。在REACH的4287名参与者(2097名[48.9%]男孩和2190名[51.1%]女孩)中,11至12岁时男孩和女孩在SMFQ上的差异明显(平均截距差异:0.75[95%置信区间0.25 - 1.25])。在TCC的2813名参与者(1490名男孩[53.0%]和1323名女孩[47.0%])中,男孩和女孩在SMFQ上的差异在较晚年龄出现,即11岁至14岁之间,在此期间男孩的SMFQ下降而女孩的上升(斜率平均差异0.52[95%置信区间0.40至0.65])。两个队列中男孩和女孩在SMFQ上的差异逐年扩大;到16岁时,REACH中男孩和女孩在SMFQ上的差异(斜率平均差异0.98[95%置信区间0.77至1.20])约为TTC中差异(0.52[0.40至0.65])的两倍。REACH中女孩的SMFQ年增长率(1.1[95%置信区间0.9 - 1.3])约为TTC中女孩年增长率(0.3[0.2 - 0.4])的四倍。我们几乎没有发现证据表明这些性别不平等差异是由于测量不可比导致的。
年轻人情绪健康方面的性别不平等取决于具体情境,或许可通过社会和结构变革加以预防。
日本学术振兴会、英国经济和社会研究委员会以及欧洲研究委员会。
摘要的日文翻译见补充材料部分。