Luo Shiwei, Mei Xilong, Shang Youlan, Yao Jiaqi, Keranmu Nuerbiya, He Shaqi, Yu Cheng, Tang Fei, Li Cong, Yang Wenhan, Liu Jun
Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Imaging Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, China.
Insights Imaging. 2025 Mar 22;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01943-5.
To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose pancreatic CT perfusion (pCTP) in detecting insulinomas in patients with recurrent hypoglycemia, and to compare its diagnostic performance with conventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and MRI.
This study retrospectively collected 53 patients with recurrent hypoglycemia (28 with insulinomas; 25 without insulinomas). PCTP image analysis was conducted by two radiologists. Quantitative perfusion parameters of insulinomas vs. tumor-free pancreatic parenchyma were analyzed. For cases where both pCTP and CECT/MRI were performed, six radiologists blinded to the patients' diagnosis independently evaluated the pCTP and CECT/MRI to determine the presence and location of insulinoma. The diagnostic performance of insulinoma detection between pCTP and CECT/MRI was compared.
For patients who underwent both CECT and pCTP, the sensitivity (CECT 0.167-0.333 vs. pCTP 0.667-1.000) of tumor detection was higher for five of six radiologists on pCTP than on CECT. For patients who underwent both MRI and pCTP, four radiologists showed higher sensitivity (MRI 0.400-600 vs. pCTP 0.700-0.800) of tumor detection on pCTP than on MRI, while two radiologists showed slightly lower sensitivity (MRI 0.800, 1.000 vs. pCTP 0.700, 0.900) on pCTP. Among perfusion parameters, peak enhancement, blood flow, and mean transit time exhibited higher AUC than blood volume and time to peak.
PCTP demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in insulinoma detection among less-experienced radiologists compared to CECT and MRI, while more-experienced radiologists achieved marginally better results with MRI. These findings suggest pCTP's potential as a complementary imaging modality, particularly beneficial for junior radiologists in insulinoma detection.
Pancreatic CT perfusion exhibited promising diagnostic performance in insulinoma detection, particularly among junior radiologists, demonstrating the potential to complement conventional imaging modalities and serve as a valuable clinical tool for the detection and localization of insulinoma.
Accurate preoperative identification and localization of insulinomas is important for appropriate treatment. Peak enhancement, blood flow, and mean transit time outperformed blood volume and time to peak in insulinoma detection. Pancreatic CT perfusion has the potential to complement conventional imaging modalities for insulinoma detection.
评估低剂量胰腺CT灌注(pCTP)在检测复发性低血糖患者胰岛素瘤中的疗效,并将其诊断性能与传统对比增强CT(CECT)和MRI进行比较。
本研究回顾性收集了53例复发性低血糖患者(28例有胰岛素瘤;25例无胰岛素瘤)。由两名放射科医生进行pCTP图像分析。分析胰岛素瘤与无肿瘤胰腺实质的定量灌注参数。对于同时进行pCTP和CECT/MRI的病例,六名对患者诊断不知情的放射科医生独立评估pCTP和CECT/MRI,以确定胰岛素瘤的存在和位置。比较pCTP和CECT/MRI在检测胰岛素瘤方面的诊断性能。
对于同时接受CECT和pCTP检查的患者,六名放射科医生中有五名在pCTP上检测肿瘤的敏感性(CECT为0.167 - 0.333,pCTP为0.667 - 1.000)高于CECT。对于同时接受MRI和pCTP检查的患者,四名放射科医生在pCTP上检测肿瘤的敏感性(MRI为0.400 - 0.600,pCTP为0.700 - 0.800)高于MRI,而两名放射科医生在pCTP上的敏感性略低(MRI为0.800、1.000,pCTP为0.700、0.900)。在灌注参数中,峰值增强、血流量和平均通过时间的曲线下面积(AUC)高于血容量和达峰时间。
与CECT和MRI相比,在经验较少的放射科医生中,pCTP在检测胰岛素瘤方面表现出卓越的诊断性能,而经验更丰富的放射科医生使用MRI取得的结果略好。这些发现表明pCTP作为一种补充成像方式的潜力,尤其有利于初级放射科医生检测胰岛素瘤。
胰腺CT灌注在检测胰岛素瘤方面表现出有前景的诊断性能,特别是在初级放射科医生中,显示出补充传统成像方式并作为检测和定位胰岛素瘤的有价值临床工具的潜力。
胰岛素瘤的准确术前识别和定位对于适当治疗很重要。在胰岛素瘤检测中,峰值增强、血流量和平均通过时间优于血容量和达峰时间。胰腺CT灌注有潜力补充传统成像方式用于检测胰岛素瘤。