Price Sarah N, Land Stephanie R, Pebley Kinsey, Fahey Margaret C, Palmer Amanda M, McCall Marcia H, Raper Pamela J, Rojewski Alana M, Croghan Ivana T, Wagner Lynne I, Toll Benjamin A
Wake Forest University School of Medicine Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Winston-Salem, NC.
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf071.
Tobacco use can adversely affect cancer treatment outcomes, yet routine assessment has not been fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials. In 2012, rates of tobacco use assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute (NCI) trials were <30% at enrollment and <5% during follow-up, prompting efforts by the NCI and major oncology associations to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). This study was conducted to re-examine assessment patterns in 2022 (including utilization of the C-TUQ) and evaluate progress.
Protocols and forms from 144 actively accruing (as of December 2022) NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials were evaluated using a standardized coding instrument.
Of 144 trials, 49.3% assessed tobacco use at enrollment (43.8% measured cigarettes, 14.8% e-cigarettes, and <12.5% other tobacco products). Approximately 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, but only 3.5% used all four core items. Few measured secondhand smoke exposure (3.5%) or quit interest (2.8%). At follow-up, 8.3% assessed any form of tobacco use. Assessment rates were higher in smoking-related cancer trials.
Almost half of accruing trials did not measure any tobacco use and fewer used the C-TUQ. There was a >70% increase in tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up compared to 2012, an improvement with room for further enhancement. Standardized tobacco use information enhances investigators' ability to estimate cancer treatment efficacy, offer equitable cessation support, and accurately understand the impact of tobacco use on treatment outcomes.
In 2012, few (<30%) cancer clinical trials evaluated tobacco use at enrollment and <5% did so during follow-up, prompting efforts to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). The present study builds on this foundational paper and finds an overall increase in tobacco use assessment with room for improvement: 49.3% of trials in 2022 assessed tobacco use at enrollment and 8.3% did so during follow-up. About 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, highlighting that tobacco use assessment is not yet fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials.
烟草使用会对癌症治疗结果产生不利影响,但常规评估尚未完全纳入肿瘤学临床试验。2012年,正在积极招募患者的美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)试验中,烟草使用评估率在入组时低于30%,随访期间低于5%,这促使NCI和主要肿瘤学协会努力在肿瘤学研究和实践中促进和规范烟草评估(包括开发癌症患者烟草使用问卷 [C-TUQ])。本研究旨在重新审视2022年的评估模式(包括C-TUQ的使用情况)并评估进展。
使用标准化编码工具对144项正在积极招募患者(截至2022年12月)的NCI国家临床试验网络(NCTN)试验的方案和表格进行评估。
在144项试验中,49.3%在入组时评估了烟草使用情况(43.8%测量了香烟,14.8%测量了电子烟,低于12.5%测量了其他烟草制品)。约20.8%使用了至少一个C-TUQ问题,但只有3.5%使用了全部四个核心项目。很少有试验测量二手烟暴露情况(3.5%)或戒烟意愿(2.8%)。在随访时,8.3%评估了任何形式的烟草使用情况。与吸烟相关癌症的试验中评估率更高。
近一半正在招募患者的试验未测量任何烟草使用情况,使用C-TUQ的试验更少。与2012年相比,入组和随访时的烟草使用评估增加了70%以上,虽有改善但仍有进一步提升空间。标准化的烟草使用信息可提高研究人员估计癌症治疗疗效、提供公平戒烟支持以及准确了解烟草使用对治疗结果影响的能力。
2012年,很少有(<30%)癌症临床试验在入组时评估烟草使用情况,随访期间进行评估的不到5%,这促使人们努力在肿瘤学研究和实践中促进和规范烟草评估(包括开发癌症患者烟草使用问卷 [C-TUQ])。本研究基于这一基础论文展开,发现烟草使用评估总体有所增加,但仍有改进空间:2022年49.3%的试验在入组时评估了烟草使用情况,随访期间为8.3%。约20.8%使用了至少一个C-TUQ问题,这突出表明烟草使用评估尚未完全纳入肿瘤学临床试验。