Ishizuka Aya, Chiba Mina, Iso Hiroyasu, Katsuma Yasushi
Institute for Global Health Policy Research, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
GHM Open. 2022 Aug 31;2(1):1-11. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2021.01006.
The Group of 20 (G20) Osaka Summit in 2019 was a large step forward for global health diplomacy to build consensus on universal health coverage (UHC). To strengthen multi-stakeholder UHC partnership, Japan involved the research and policy advice network for G20 (Think 20: T20), civil society (Civil 20: C20), private initiatives of medical professional groups (H20), and the pharmaceutical sector. We attempted to identify UHC-related issues addressed and left unaddressed at the G20 Osaka, to bring lessons for future G20. We reviewed the G20 Osaka Leaders' Declaration, policy-related statements, and voices of the relevant G20 engagement groups and sectors. In July 2019, after the G20 Osaka Leaders' Summit, we organized an expert meeting convening Japan-based UHC-related key global health stakeholders. This review provides record of main findings presented in form of classifying the voices expressed in the meeting by UHC-related topics, and definitional ranges of UHC summarized. The T20, H20, and the pharmaceutical sector noted during our expert meeting that the ministerial-level health-finance collaboration was one of the key agendas suggested at the G20. T20 and C20 called for a recognition of health needs of refugees, migrants and other vulnerable groups in achieving UHC. Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) with a human rights-based approach through UHC was raised by the C20 as an issue unaddressed in G20 Osaka. Variation in operative purposes between global health stakeholders led to a definitional difference in the scope of UHC. The definitional difference could delay progress of UHC attainment. Addressing migrant and refugee health and SRHR within the context of UHC is further needed. Understanding perspectives of various stakeholders will become increasingly important to well-coordinate multi-actor cooperation with adequate social responsibility and transparency in UHC achievement and public-private partnership. In future G20, for UHC in the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic worlds there is need of ) ensuring an integrated yet comprehensive multi-stakeholder approach towards UHC; ) incorporating important dimensions such as the marginalized population and gender; and ) ensuring adequate investments toward health information systems and governance to track health data for the vulnerable population and gender-responsive financing.
2019年二十国集团(G20)大阪峰会是全球卫生外交在全民健康覆盖(UHC)方面达成共识的一大进步。为加强多方利益相关者的全民健康覆盖伙伴关系,日本邀请了G20研究与政策咨询网络(二十国智库会议:T20)、民间社会(二十国民间社会会议:C20)、医学专业团体的私营倡议组织(H20)以及制药行业参与。我们试图确定G20大阪峰会已解决和未解决的全民健康覆盖相关问题,为未来的G20峰会提供经验教训。我们审查了G20大阪峰会领导人宣言、政策相关声明以及相关G20参与团体和部门的意见。2019年7月,在G20大阪峰会领导人峰会之后,我们组织了一次专家会议,召集了日本国内与全民健康覆盖相关的关键全球卫生利益相关者。本审查记录了主要调查结果,这些结果以按全民健康覆盖相关主题对会议中表达的意见进行分类的形式呈现,并总结了全民健康覆盖的定义范围。二十国智库会议、H20和制药行业在我们的专家会议上指出,部长级卫生与财政合作是G20提出的关键议程之一。二十国智库会议和二十国民间社会会议呼吁在实现全民健康覆盖的过程中认识到难民、移民和其他弱势群体的健康需求。二十国民间社会会议提出,通过全民健康覆盖以基于人权的方式实现性与生殖健康及权利(SRHR)是G20大阪峰会未解决的问题。全球卫生利益相关者在行动目标上的差异导致了全民健康覆盖范围定义上的差异。这种定义上的差异可能会延缓全民健康覆盖目标的实现进程。在全民健康覆盖的背景下进一步解决移民和难民健康以及性与生殖健康及权利问题很有必要。了解各利益相关者的观点对于在全民健康覆盖的实现以及公私伙伴关系中以适当的社会责任和透明度协调多行为体合作将变得越来越重要。在未来的G20峰会上,对于新冠疫情期间及疫情后世界的全民健康覆盖,需要(1)确保对全民健康覆盖采取综合且全面的多方利益相关者方法;(2)纳入边缘化人群和性别等重要层面;(3)确保对卫生信息系统和治理进行充分投资,以跟踪弱势群体的健康数据并提供性别平等响应式融资。