Short Versus Long Myotomy Length in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: Comparable Efficacy with Potential Reduction in Incidence of Reflux-A Meta-Analysis of 10 Comparative Studies.

Shortening the myotomy length during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia has been hypothesized to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) incidence while maintaining procedural efficacy. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of short POEM (S-POEM) and long POEM (L-POEM). A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines identified studies directly comparing S-POEM and L-POEM. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials tools. A pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. In perioperative outcomes, S-POEM significantly reduced operative time and required fewer clips compared with L-POEM, with no significant differences in adverse events or length of stay. Regarding GERD-related outcomes, S-POEM demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in abnormal esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour pH-impedance testing, with a number needed to treat of 10. While the reduction in symptomatic GERD did not reach statistical significance ( = .06), the value was very close to the threshold for significance (.05), and all seven included studies reported decreased symptomatic GERD with S-POEM. This is therefore considered a noteworthy finding. The rates of esophagitis and lower esophageal sphincter pressure did not differ significantly between the groups. Efficacy-related outcomes, including clinical success, Eckardt score, and barium height at 5 minutes, were comparable between S-POEM and L-POEM. However, integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the S-POEM group. This study suggests that shortening the myotomy length may reduce GERD incidence following POEM without compromising its efficacy in achalasia treatment. In addition, a shorter myotomy length decreases operative time, potentially reducing time-related costs and improving workflow.