Saxena Hetvi, Mathur Tejaswini, Tiwari Ruchika, Singh Vikas Kunwar, Thanvi Gaurang, Lathi Priyal
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, MGUMST, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Apr;24(2):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02230-4. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
A variety of screw types have been used in Midfacial fracture bone fixation such as lag screws, pre-tapped screw, self-drilling screws (SDS) and self-tapping screws (STS) with varying degrees of success.
A split face technique was adopted in which both SDS and STS of 8 mm in length were inserted in the same patient but the site of placement (right or left side) was done using random allocation by computer generated sequence method. We designed this study to evaluate all screws with respect to torque measurement, pain and infection and to determine the relative advantages of each type.
In all the 30 patients included in the study, the average time for fixation of SDS was 17.7 ± 8.2 s while it was 36.7 ± 3.0 s for STS. The insertional torque for SDS was determined to be 20.5 ± 1.9 cNm while it was 13.1 ± 1.2 cNm for STS. All patients, experienced pain on 5th post-operative day bilaterally. After 1 month of surgery, out of 30 patients only 8 (26.7%) patients reported presence of pain at the SDS side whereas 15 (50%) patients were experiencing pain at the STS side. All patients in either of the two groups did not show any sign or symptom of infection till 1 month follow-up. In 3rd month follow-up, out of 30 patients, 2 patients developed infection at the SDS site and 4 patients developed infection at the STS site.
SDS were found superior in comparison with STS in terms of intra-operative fixation time and insertional torque in midface while in terms of pain and plate infection, SDS were not significantly different when compared with STS.
多种螺钉类型已用于面中部骨折的骨固定,如拉力螺钉、预攻丝螺钉、自钻螺钉(SDS)和自攻丝螺钉(STS),其成功率各不相同。
采用面部劈开技术,将长度为8毫米的SDS和STS插入同一患者体内,但放置部位(右侧或左侧)通过计算机生成序列法随机分配。我们设计本研究以评估所有螺钉的扭矩测量、疼痛和感染情况,并确定每种类型的相对优势。
在纳入研究的所有30例患者中,SDS的平均固定时间为17.7±8.2秒,而STS为36.7±3.0秒。SDS的插入扭矩为20.5±1.9厘牛顿米,而STS为13.1±1.2厘牛顿米。所有患者在术后第5天双侧均感到疼痛。术后1个月,30例患者中只有8例(26.7%)报告SDS侧有疼痛,而15例(50%)患者在STS侧有疼痛。两组中的所有患者在1个月随访时均未出现任何感染迹象或症状。在第3个月随访时,30例患者中,2例在SDS部位发生感染,4例在STS部位发生感染。
在面中部,SDS在术中固定时间和插入扭矩方面优于STS,而在疼痛和钢板感染方面,SDS与STS相比无显著差异。