Suppr超能文献

比较自攻自钻微型螺钉与自攻微型螺钉治疗面中部骨折的疗效:一项随机半脸研究。

Comparing the Outcomes of Self-drilling and Self-tapping Mini-Screws in Midfacial Fractures: A Randomized Split-Face Study.

作者信息

Saxena Hetvi, Mathur Tejaswini, Tiwari Ruchika, Singh Vikas Kunwar, Thanvi Gaurang, Lathi Priyal

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, MGUMST, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Apr;24(2):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02230-4. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A variety of screw types have been used in Midfacial fracture bone fixation such as lag screws, pre-tapped screw, self-drilling screws (SDS) and self-tapping screws (STS) with varying degrees of success.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A split face technique was adopted in which both SDS and STS of 8 mm in length were inserted in the same patient but the site of placement (right or left side) was done using random allocation by computer generated sequence method. We designed this study to evaluate all screws with respect to torque measurement, pain and infection and to determine the relative advantages of each type.

RESULTS

In all the 30 patients included in the study, the average time for fixation of SDS was 17.7 ± 8.2 s while it was 36.7 ± 3.0 s for STS. The insertional torque for SDS was determined to be 20.5 ± 1.9 cNm while it was 13.1 ± 1.2 cNm for STS. All patients, experienced pain on 5th post-operative day bilaterally. After 1 month of surgery, out of 30 patients only 8 (26.7%) patients reported presence of pain at the SDS side whereas 15 (50%) patients were experiencing pain at the STS side. All patients in either of the two groups did not show any sign or symptom of infection till 1 month follow-up. In 3rd month follow-up, out of 30 patients, 2 patients developed infection at the SDS site and 4 patients developed infection at the STS site.

CONCLUSION

SDS were found superior in comparison with STS in terms of intra-operative fixation time and insertional torque in midface while in terms of pain and plate infection, SDS were not significantly different when compared with STS.

摘要

引言

多种螺钉类型已用于面中部骨折的骨固定,如拉力螺钉、预攻丝螺钉、自钻螺钉(SDS)和自攻丝螺钉(STS),其成功率各不相同。

材料与方法

采用面部劈开技术,将长度为8毫米的SDS和STS插入同一患者体内,但放置部位(右侧或左侧)通过计算机生成序列法随机分配。我们设计本研究以评估所有螺钉的扭矩测量、疼痛和感染情况,并确定每种类型的相对优势。

结果

在纳入研究的所有30例患者中,SDS的平均固定时间为17.7±8.2秒,而STS为36.7±3.0秒。SDS的插入扭矩为20.5±1.9厘牛顿米,而STS为13.1±1.2厘牛顿米。所有患者在术后第5天双侧均感到疼痛。术后1个月,30例患者中只有8例(26.7%)报告SDS侧有疼痛,而15例(50%)患者在STS侧有疼痛。两组中的所有患者在1个月随访时均未出现任何感染迹象或症状。在第3个月随访时,30例患者中,2例在SDS部位发生感染,4例在STS部位发生感染。

结论

在面中部,SDS在术中固定时间和插入扭矩方面优于STS,而在疼痛和钢板感染方面,SDS与STS相比无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Outcomes of Self-drilling and Self-tapping Mini-Screws in Midfacial Fractures: A Randomized Split-Face Study.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Apr;24(2):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02230-4. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
5
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub3.
6
Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 14;2(2):CD013404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013404.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Sertindole for schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Prevalence, pattern, etiology, and management of maxillofacial trauma in a developing country: a retrospective study.
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;42(4):174-81. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.174. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Comparative study of the primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic miniscrews.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.020.
4
Self-drilling and self-tapping screws: an ultrastructural study.
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Mar;21(2):513-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d023bd.
5
Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.030.
6
Remodeling along the bone-screw interface.
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Sep;69(5):337-48. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0806-6.
7
Self-tapping and self-drilling screws for intermaxillary fixation in management of mandibular fractures.
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jan;20(1):68-70. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318190df2f.
8
Application of intermaxillary fixation screws in maxillofacial trauma.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1746-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.022.
10
Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.030.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验