Wilps Tyler J, Kaufmann Robert A, Gorenflo James W, Yamakawa Satoshi, Debski Richard E
Department Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Bioengineering and Orthopedic Robotics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Dec 11;7(2):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.11.006. eCollection 2025 Mar.
As the elbow flexes with the arm at the side (0° humerothoracic abduction, HTA), it loses its valgus carrying angle. When the arm is abducted to 90° HTA, a varus torque tensions the lateral ligaments. Our purpose was to quantify the effect of abduction on elbow kinematics during active motion and the effect of lateral forearm muscle activation. We hypothesized that arm abduction would increase elbow varus angulation throughout flexion, and lateral forearm muscle activation would decrease varus angulation.
A dynamic elbow testing apparatus was employed in six human cadaver arms at two levels of arm abduction, 0° and 90° HTA. Six electromechanical actuators simulated muscle action, whereas joint position was measured to quantify the relationship between the forearm and humerus as the elbow was actively flexed.
All elbows maintained greater varus angle with the arm at 90° HTA compared with 0° HTA, significant at 60° flexion, 4.3° versus 3.4°, 90° flexion, 8.0° versus 6.8°, and 120° flexion, 10.5° versus 8.9°. The abducted elbow demonstrated less varus angle when the lateral stabilizers were activated. A significant difference was found at 30° flexion, 0.9 versus 1.5, 60° flexion, 3.8 versus 4.3, and 90° flexion, 7.6 versus 8.0.
Elbow joint coronal plane kinematics were influenced by abduction of the arm to 90° HTA, and greater elbow varus angles were found throughout flexion when compared with the arm at side position (0° HTA). In addition, activation of lateral forearm muscles (90° HTA + Lat Stab) decreased elbow varus angulation throughout flexion.
Understanding the effect of varus torque on elbow biomechanics and the degree to which these effects are countered through dynamic stabilization may assist in arthroplasty and ligamentous reconstruction designs.
当手臂位于身体一侧屈肘时(肩胸外展0°),肘部失去其携带角。当手臂外展至肩胸外展90°时,内翻扭矩会拉紧外侧韧带。我们的目的是量化外展对主动运动时肘部运动学的影响以及前臂外侧肌肉激活的影响。我们假设手臂外展会在整个屈肘过程中增加肘部内翻角度,而前臂外侧肌肉激活会减少内翻角度。
使用动态肘部测试装置对6具人体尸体手臂在两个手臂外展水平(肩胸外展0°和90°)进行测试。六个电动执行器模拟肌肉动作,同时测量关节位置以量化肘部主动屈曲时前臂与肱骨之间的关系。
与肩胸外展0°相比,所有肘部在肩胸外展90°时保持更大的内翻角度,在60°屈曲时差异显著,分别为4.3°对3.4°,90°屈曲时为8.0°对6.8°,120°屈曲时为10.5°对8.9°。当激活外侧稳定结构时,外展肘部的内翻角度较小。在30°屈曲时(0.9对1.5)、60°屈曲时(3.8对4.3)和90°屈曲时(7.6对8.0)发现显著差异。
手臂外展至肩胸外展90°会影响肘关节冠状面运动学,与手臂位于身体一侧(肩胸外展0°)相比,在整个屈肘过程中会出现更大的肘部内翻角度。此外,激活前臂外侧肌肉(肩胸外展90° + 外侧稳定结构)会在整个屈肘过程中减少肘部内翻角度。
了解内翻扭矩对肘部生物力学的影响以及通过动态稳定作用抵消这些影响的程度,可能有助于关节置换术和韧带重建设计。