de Boer Wytze S, Parlevliet Krista L, Kooistra Leonie A, Koster David, Nieuwenhuis Jellie A, Edens Mireille A, van den Berg Jan Willem K, Boomsma Martijn F, Stigt Jos A, Slebos Dirk Jan, Duiverman Marieke L
Department of Pulmonology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Respir Med. 2025 May;241:108083. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108083. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
Diaphragm dysfunction is a frequently overlooked cause of dyspnea. Diagnosis typically relies on a combination of history, symptoms, and imaging. Diaphragm ultrasound is a promising alternative for fluoroscopy. This study evaluated the construct validity of ultrasound compared to traditional diagnostic methods in diaphragm dysfunction.
A prospective, operator-blinded study was conducted at two centers in the Netherlands. Thirty-six adults with suspected diaphragm dysfunction underwent fluoroscopy, pulmonary function tests, and ultrasound examination. The primary outcome was the agreement between predefined ultrasound diagnostic criteria and traditional diagnostic criteria (fluoroscopy, pulmonary function tests). Secondary outcomes included concordance of diagnostic criteria with the treating physician's final diagnosis, agreement of individual test parameters, and inter-rater reliability.
The diagnostic criteria for ultrasound and traditional tests were concordant in 55.6 % (95 %CI: 0.381-0.721) of cases. Ultrasound criteria showed higher concordance with the treating physician's final diagnosis (75.0 %, 95 %CI: 0.578-0.879) compared to traditional test criteria (63.9 %, 95 %CI: 0.462-0.792). Individual parameters; visual ultrasound assessment, Thickening Fraction (TF), Diaphragm Excursion (DE), and fluoroscopy, had high concordance with the final diagnosis at 91.4 %, 90.3 %, 88.3 %, and 91.7 %, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for fluoroscopy, visual ultrasound assessment, and DE, but poor for TF.
This study demonstrates that ultrasound is a reliable tool for diagnosing diaphragm dysfunction, showing high concordance with the treating physician's final diagnosis and strong performance of individual parameters. The robust inter-rater reliability for visual assessment and DE supports its use as alternative to traditional methods like fluoroscopy in clinical practice. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05682027).
膈肌功能障碍是呼吸困难的一个常被忽视的原因。诊断通常依赖于病史、症状和影像学检查的综合判断。膈肌超声是一种有前景的替代荧光透视检查的方法。本研究评估了在膈肌功能障碍方面,与传统诊断方法相比,超声检查的结构效度。
在荷兰的两个中心进行了一项前瞻性、操作者盲法研究。36名疑似膈肌功能障碍的成年人接受了荧光透视检查、肺功能测试和超声检查。主要结局是预定义的超声诊断标准与传统诊断标准(荧光透视检查、肺功能测试)之间的一致性。次要结局包括诊断标准与主治医生最终诊断的一致性、各个测试参数的一致性以及评分者间信度。
超声检查和传统检查的诊断标准在55.6%(95%CI:0.381 - 0.721)的病例中一致。与传统检查标准(63.9%,95%CI:0.462 - 0.792)相比,超声标准与主治医生的最终诊断显示出更高的一致性(75.0%,95%CI:0.578 - 0.879)。各个参数;超声视觉评估、增厚分数(TF)、膈肌移动度(DE)以及荧光透视检查,与最终诊断的一致性分别为91.4%、90.3%、88.3%和91.7%。荧光透视检查、超声视觉评估和DE的评分者间信度良好,但TF的评分者间信度较差。
本研究表明,超声是诊断膈肌功能障碍的可靠工具,与主治医生的最终诊断显示出高度一致性,且各个参数表现良好。视觉评估和DE强大的评分者间信度支持其在临床实践中作为荧光透视等传统方法的替代方法使用。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT05682027)