Alqahtani Nasser M, Chaturvedi Saurabh, Addas Mohamed Khaled, AlQahtani Manar Fahad A, Alhudiry Arwa Ahmed M, Qahtani Shahrah H, Zarbah Mohammad A, Elmahdi Asim Elsir, Cicciù Marco, Minervini Giuseppe
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, Catania, Italy.
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 3;13:e19117. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19117. eCollection 2025.
Digital technologies can enhance the success of permanent crowns. The present study aimed to evaluate marginal adaptation and internal fit of permanent crowns fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technologies following scans using two different intraoral scanners (IOS) (Medit i700, shape (TRIOS 3)).
Three typodont #14 teeth were prepared for full veneer all ceramic crowns with three types of margins-chamfer (CFL), rounded shoulder (RSFL) and rounded shoulder with bevel (RSBFL). A total of 360 study models were made and divided into two groups based on the type of intraoral scanner used for digital impressions. Group A in which the intraoral scanner MEDIT i700 was used, and Group B in which intraoral scanner TRIOS 3 was used (n = 360/group). The subgroups were made as Medit i700-SLA, Medit i700-DLP, TRIOS 3-SLA and TRIOS 3-DLP (n = 180/subgroup). These were further divided into three sub-subgroups based on the finish lines: CFL, RSFL, and RSBFL (n = 30 each sub-subgroups). All ceramic crowns were made on models and scanned to assess discrepancies (marginal adaptation and internal fit) at nine zones (Z1-Z9). Three-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparison was done (Tukey HSD test) ( = 0.05).
The mean marginal gap and internal fit values were lowest for Group A-1 with RSBFL in each zone. The intergroup comparison showed values for marginal gap and the internal fit were minimum for Group A-1 for each finish line design, with the lowest for RSBFL at zone Z2 0.04 ±0.001.
Regardless of the IOS and 3D printing techniques, the smallest gap was observed in RSBFL, followed by RSFL and CFL. The all-ceramic crowns fabricated using a Medit intraoral scanner with an SLA 3DPrinter with a rounded shoulder finish line had the best marginal and internal fit.
数字技术可以提高永久性牙冠的成功率。本研究旨在评估使用立体光刻(SLA)和数字光处理(DLP)3D打印技术制作的永久性牙冠在使用两种不同的口内扫描仪(IOS)(Medit i700、Shape(TRIOS 3))扫描后的边缘适合性和内部适合性。
为三颗全瓷贴面冠准备了三个标准牙模#14牙齿,边缘类型有三种——倒角(CFL)、圆肩(RSFL)和带斜面的圆肩(RSBFL)。共制作了360个研究模型,并根据用于数字印模的口内扫描仪类型分为两组。A组使用口内扫描仪MEDIT i700,B组使用口内扫描仪TRIOS 3(每组n = 360)。亚组分为Medit i700 - SLA、Medit i700 - DLP、TRIOS 3 - SLA和TRIOS 3 - DLP(每个亚组n = 180)。这些又根据边缘线进一步分为三个子亚组:CFL、RSFL和RSBFL(每个子亚组n = 30)。在模型上制作全瓷冠,并进行扫描以评估九个区域(Z1 - Z9)的差异(边缘适合性和内部适合性)。进行了三因素方差分析和两两比较(Tukey HSD检验)(α = 0.05)。
在每个区域中,A - 1组带RSBFL的平均边缘间隙和内部适合性值最低。组间比较显示,对于每种边缘线设计,A - 1组的边缘间隙和内部适合性值最小,在Z2区域RSBFL的最低值为0.04±0.001。
无论IOS和3D打印技术如何,RSBFL的间隙最小,其次是RSFL和CFL。使用Medit口内扫描仪和带圆肩边缘线的SLA 3D打印机制作的全瓷冠具有最佳的边缘和内部适合性。