Gupta Vivek Kumar, Mahesan Harish, Murali Vignesh, Jeganathan Parthiban, Perumal Suresh, Sivaraman Arumugam
Centre for Sports Science, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Apr;15(4):221-228. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i04.5506.
Due to the yearly rise in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, revision ACL reconstruction is becoming more and more common in knee surgery. Choosing the appropriate graft and determining the surgical treatment staging by assessing the likelihood of doing the most anatomical revision canals and placing them with the primary canals before surgery are crucial factors affecting treatment outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes in revision ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts in a single-stage revision ACL reconstruction.
Twenty-three patients who were eligible for follow-up among 25 surgeries performed between 2015 and 2023 were included in this retrospective analysis and met the inclusion criteria. The patient reported functional outcome, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain before the injury and during the most recent follow-up. The peroneus longus (PL) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) groups' patient-reported results were assessed.
There were no significant differences between the two revision groups with PL and BPTB autograft in terms of age, sex, duration between injury and surgery, concurrent injuries, and isolated or complex surgeries. There was not a significant difference between the groups' pre-injury patient-reported outcomes, including the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity, and VAS for pain (n.s.). There was not a significant difference in the two groups' functional results at follow-up, although both groups' functional outcomes improved and all patients recovered to their pre-injury activity level.
Overall, the findings suggest that graft options (peroneus longus and BTB) and surgical complexities (isolated and complex revision) yield comparable functional outcomes for most measures. However, notable differences in post-operative pain levels warrant further exploration. These results underscore the effectiveness of both graft types and surgical techniques in achieving satisfactory recovery while acknowledging the necessity of customized approaches to pain management based on individual patient circumstances.
由于初次前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术的年增长率,翻修ACL重建在膝关节手术中越来越常见。选择合适的移植物,并通过评估在手术前进行最解剖学翻修通道并将其与初次通道放置在一起的可能性来确定手术治疗分期,是影响治疗结果的关键因素。
本研究的目的是评估在单阶段翻修ACL重建中使用腓骨长肌和骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)自体移植物进行翻修ACL重建时,患者报告的功能结果的差异。
本回顾性分析纳入了2015年至2023年期间进行的25例手术中符合随访条件的23例患者,这些患者均符合纳入标准。记录患者报告的功能结果、Lysholm膝关节评分、Tegner活动水平以及受伤前和最近一次随访期间的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。对腓骨长肌(PL)组和骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)组患者报告的结果进行了评估。
在年龄、性别、受伤与手术之间的持续时间、并发损伤以及单纯或复杂手术方面,使用PL和BPTB自体移植物的两个翻修组之间没有显著差异。两组受伤前患者报告的结果,包括Lysholm膝关节评分、Tegner活动度和VAS疼痛评分,差异均无统计学意义(无显著性差异)。两组随访时的功能结果没有显著差异,尽管两组的功能结果均有所改善,且所有患者均恢复到受伤前的活动水平。
总体而言,研究结果表明,移植物选择(腓骨长肌和BTB)和手术复杂性(单纯和复杂翻修)在大多数测量指标上产生了可比的功能结果。然而,术后疼痛水平的显著差异值得进一步探索。这些结果强调了两种移植物类型和手术技术在实现满意恢复方面的有效性,同时也认识到根据个体患者情况定制疼痛管理方法的必要性。