Ried Isabelle, Krinke Insa, Adolf Rafael, Krönke Markus, Moosavi Seyed Mahdi, Hendrich Eva, Will Albrecht, Bressem Keno, Hadamitzky Martin
School of Medicine and Health, Department of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital, German Heart Center, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12817. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95597-4.
Over the past decade, coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has been the most robust non-invasive method for evaluating significant coronary stenosis. Thanks to new technologies, it is now possible to determine the fractional flow reserve (FFR) non-invasively using computed tomographic (CT) images. The aim of this work was to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of CT-derived FFR for ischemia detection. In this retrospective monocentric study, we investigated 421 patients who underwent CCTA and subsequent ischemia testing between 04/2009 and 06/2020. Endpoint was ischemia on a coronary vessel level assessed by CMR (n = 20), SPECT (n = 225), invasive angiography (stenosis ≥ 90%; n = 80) or invasive FFR (positive if ≤ 0.8; n = 96). CT-FFR was derived from CCTA images by a machine learning (ML) based software prototype. Patients averaged 66.5 [58.2-73.6] years of age and 72.7% (n = 306) were male. Overall, 52.5% (n = 221) had hypertension and 67.9% (n = 286) had hypercholesteremia. Logistic regression analysis on a per vessel base showed that the diagnostic model with CT-FFR plus CCTA had significantly better-fit criteria than the diagnostic model with CCTA alone (log-likelihood χ 230.21 vs. 192.17; p for difference < 0.001). In particular, the area under curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis for CT-FFR plus CCTA (0.87) demonstrated greater discrimination of hemodynamic ischemia compared to CCTA alone (0.83; p for difference < 0.0001). Combined CCTA and CT-FFR have improved diagnostic accuracy compared to CCTA alone in detecting ischemia on the coronary vessel level and thus could reduce the use of invasive coronary angiography in the future.
在过去十年中,冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)一直是评估显著冠状动脉狭窄最可靠的非侵入性方法。得益于新技术,现在可以使用计算机断层扫描(CT)图像非侵入性地确定血流储备分数(FFR)。这项工作的目的是评估CT衍生的FFR对缺血检测的增量诊断价值。在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们调查了2009年4月至2020年6月期间接受CCTA及后续缺血检测的421例患者。终点是通过心脏磁共振成像(CMR,n = 20)、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT,n = 225)、有创血管造影(狭窄≥90%;n = 80)或有创FFR(≤0.8为阳性;n = 96)评估的冠状动脉水平的缺血情况。CT-FFR由基于机器学习(ML)的软件原型从CCTA图像中得出。患者平均年龄为[58.2 - 73.6]岁,66.5岁,72.7%(n = 306)为男性。总体而言,52.5%(n = 221)患有高血压,67.9%(n = 286)患有高胆固醇血症。基于每支血管的逻辑回归分析表明,CT-FFR加CCTA的诊断模型比单独使用CCTA的诊断模型具有显著更好的拟合标准(对数似然χ² 30.21对192.17;差异p < 0.001)。特别是,通过接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析得出的CT-FFR加CCTA的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.87)显示,与单独使用CCTA相比(0.83;差异p < 0.0001),对血流动力学缺血的辨别能力更强。与单独使用CCTA相比,联合使用CCTA和CT-FFR在检测冠状动脉水平的缺血方面提高了诊断准确性,因此未来可能会减少有创冠状动脉造影的使用。