Suppr超能文献

3D打印在放射治疗个性化剂量计算中的应用:一项系统综述。

Application of 3D printing for personalized boluses in radiotherapy: a systematic review.

作者信息

Bochyńska Aleksandra, Zawadzka Anna, Kukołowicz Paweł, Spałek Mateusz Jacek

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025 Mar 21;30(1):100-113. doi: 10.5603/rpor.104014. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the current literature covering the topic of 3D-printed radiotherapy boluses in the context of fabrication methods, materials, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were extracted for authors, publication details, application type, printing technique and materials, study type, radiation type, reported outcomes and implementation difficulties. The search yielded 161 articles, 52 of which met the inclusion criteria. Publications on 3D printing for customized boluses have increased since 2014, with the most articles from the United States (21%). Most studies (80.8%) focused on manufacturing custom boluses and testing 3D printing materials, whereas 19.2% explored creating molds for boluses. CT scans were the primary method for defining the bolus area (88.6%). The publications included three study types: dosimetric evaluations, evaluations with anthropomorphic phantoms, and clinical case studies. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) was the most common printing technique (88.1%), with Polylactic Acid (PLA) being the most frequently used material (57.1%). Challenges included ensuring proper fit, assessing material properties, and managing printing time. The outcomes of this review suggest that 3D printing technology holds significant promise for improving radiotherapy by creating custom-fit boluses. 3D-printed boluses demonstrated notable advantages, such as improved dose distribution, better bolus conformity, and reduced setup times. However, several limitations have been identified, including considerable variability in study designs, making it challenging to draw generalized conclusions. Some studies had small sample sizes or did not clearly report methodological details. Addressing these issues will help to optimize technology's implementation.

摘要

本研究的目的是在制造方法、材料和临床结果的背景下,评估当前涵盖3D打印放射治疗填充物主题的文献。本系统评价遵循PRISMA 2020指南。提取了作者、出版细节、应用类型、打印技术和材料、研究类型、辐射类型、报告的结果和实施困难等数据。检索共得到161篇文章,其中52篇符合纳入标准。自2014年以来,关于定制填充物的3D打印的出版物有所增加,其中来自美国的文章最多(21%)。大多数研究(80.8%)专注于制造定制填充物和测试3D打印材料,而19.2%的研究探索了制作填充物模具。CT扫描是定义填充物区域的主要方法(88.6%)。这些出版物包括三种研究类型:剂量学评估、使用人体模型的评估和临床案例研究。熔融沉积建模(FDM)是最常见的打印技术(88.1%),聚乳酸(PLA)是最常用的材料(57.1%)。挑战包括确保合适的贴合度、评估材料性能和管理打印时间。本综述的结果表明,3D打印技术通过制造定制贴合的填充物,在改善放射治疗方面具有巨大潜力。3D打印的填充物显示出显著优势,如改善剂量分布、更好的填充物贴合度和减少设置时间。然而,已发现一些局限性,包括研究设计存在相当大的差异,难以得出一般性结论。一些研究样本量较小或未明确报告方法细节。解决这些问题将有助于优化该技术的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dffb/11999008/badfe7579291/rpor-30-1-100f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验