Yamasaki Y, Tochigi H, Tajima K, Yanagawa M, Hayashi N, Sakurai M, Yamakawa K, Tada S, Nakamura K, Hirano T
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985 Mar;31(3):387-95.
Renal arterial embolization is often used in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma, either preoperatively to facilitate nephrectomy or as palliative therapy in advanced cases. Eighteen patients (18/58; 31%) underwent renal arterial embolization in our department since 1979, initial 10 cases with Gelfoam and steel coil (group G) and recent 8 cases with absolute ethanol (group A). Clinical studies of daily changes of symptoms and blood chemistry in both groups after embolization were compared and the results were as follows: Severe flank pain was noted immediately after embolization but thereafter well controlled without analgesics in group A. The patients in group G experienced no pain during the procedure of embolization but have had moderate flank pain of two or three days' duration with nausea and/or vomiting and required surgical procedure within a few days after embolization. Post embolization fever in group A was described as higher than that in group G significantly. Leukocytosis was noted to be persistent for up to seven days and blood chemistry showed transient marked elevations of GOT, GPT and LDH immediately after the procedure without significant value in both groups. Embolization to advanced tumor with many parasitic vessels or massive local invasion may not always be available for remaining of viable-appearing tumor cells in venous lumen, as if palliative treatment. Absolute ethanol may be more useful as the embolizing substance than Gelfoam and steel coil by reason of producing wide severe infarction of diseased kidney. Broad marked infarction due to renal arterial embolization may make pathological diagnosis difficult. Immunological effects of renal arterial embolization were not observed in short term patients survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
肾动脉栓塞术常用于治疗肾细胞癌患者,可在术前进行以利于肾切除术,或在晚期病例中作为姑息治疗。自1979年以来,我们科室有18例患者(18/58;31%)接受了肾动脉栓塞术,最初10例使用明胶海绵和钢圈(G组),最近8例使用无水乙醇(A组)。比较了两组栓塞后症状和血液化学指标的每日变化的临床研究,结果如下:A组栓塞后立即出现严重的胁腹痛,但此后无需使用镇痛药即可得到良好控制。G组患者在栓塞过程中未感到疼痛,但在栓塞后出现了持续两三天的中度胁腹痛,并伴有恶心和/或呕吐,且在栓塞后几天内需要进行手术。A组栓塞后发热明显高于G组。白细胞增多持续长达7天,血液化学指标显示术后立即出现GOT、GPT和LDH短暂显著升高,但两组均无显著意义。对于有许多寄生血管或广泛局部侵犯的晚期肿瘤进行栓塞时,可能无法完全清除静脉腔内看似存活的肿瘤细胞,就像姑息治疗一样。无水乙醇作为栓塞剂可能比明胶海绵和钢圈更有用,因为它会使患病肾脏产生广泛严重的梗死。肾动脉栓塞导致的广泛明显梗死可能会使病理诊断变得困难。在短期患者生存中未观察到肾动脉栓塞的免疫效应。(摘要截取自250字)