Nakagawa Suguru, Kato Yoshihito, Totsuka Kiyohito, Kanda Satoru, Okinaga Kimiko, Ishii Kiyoshi
Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, 1-5, Shintoshin, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96619-x.
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is believed to induce less surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) due to smaller incisions, yet few studies have evaluated SIA in MIGS patients. This retrospective cohort study compared SIA and refractive outcomes among three MIGS techniques: first-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent (iStent [IS], n = 36), second-generation iStent inject W (IW, n = 39), and microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (μLOT, n = 36). SIA, refractive prediction error (RPE), intraocular pressure (IOP), and glaucoma subtype were analyzed. SIA remained minimal, with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.95, linear mixed model). RPE significantly differed between IW and μLOT (p = 0.025) but remained mild in both. The μLOT group exhibited a slight myopic shift and greater IOP reduction. However, absolute prediction error did not significantly differ among groups (p = 0.062). Subgroup analysis confirmed the refractive neutrality of MIGS across primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, and chronic angle-closure glaucoma. These findings support the refractive stability of MIGS when combined with cataract surgery, suggesting IS, IW, and μLOT as equally viable options from a refractive standpoint.
微创青光眼手术(MIGS)被认为由于切口较小,所引起的手术源性散光(SIA)较少,但很少有研究评估MIGS患者的SIA情况。这项回顾性队列研究比较了三种MIGS技术的SIA和屈光结果:第一代小梁微旁路支架(iStent [IS],n = 36)、第二代iStent inject W(IW,n = 39)和内路微钩小梁切开术(μLOT,n = 36)。分析了SIA、屈光预测误差(RPE)、眼压(IOP)和青光眼亚型。SIA仍然很小,组间无显著差异(p = 0.95,线性混合模型)。IW和μLOT之间的RPE有显著差异(p = 0.025),但两者均较轻。μLOT组表现出轻微的近视偏移和更大的眼压降低。然而,绝对预测误差在组间无显著差异(p = 0.062)。亚组分析证实了MIGS在原发性开角型青光眼、剥脱性青光眼和慢性闭角型青光眼中的屈光中性。这些发现支持了MIGS与白内障手术联合时的屈光稳定性,从屈光角度来看,提示IS、IW和μLOT是同样可行的选择。